Reply to Weinshall-Margel and Shapard: Extraneous factors in judicial decisions persist

Jonathan Levav · Liora Avnaim-Pesso

34 citations0/0 files storedProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Judicial and Constitutional Studies Legal processes and jurisprudence Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Abstract

Understanding household behavior and its macro consequences for society is pivotal for climate change adaptation. Yet, traditional policy decision-support models for nature–society systems oversimplify human behavior. Using original modeling ...Despite the growing calls to integrate realistic human behavior in sustainability science models, the representative rational agent prevails. This is especially problematic for climate change adaptation that relies on actions at various scales: from ...

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 34 citations exist upstream.

References

2011Extraneous factors in judicial decisions

Cited by

2018State-dependent cognition and its relevance to cultural evolution 2019The Status Quo Theory of Depletion Does Not Explain the Israeli Parole Decisions 2014Neuroscientific evidence for contextual effects in decision making 2020Desafios da agenda de pesquisa empírica em psicologia da tomada de decisão judicial no Brasil

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.