Analysis and Design of Multitrait-Multirater Performance Appraisal Studies

James M. Conway

97 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Personality Traits and Psychology Reliability and Agreement in Measurement

Abstract

Becker and Cote (1994) found that the correlated uniqueness model outperformed the confirmatory factor analysis and direct product models for multitrait-multimethod data. The present study analyzed20 multitrait-multirater performance appraisal matrices. The correlated uniqueness model was appropriate significantly more often than in Becker and Cote5 study and the other two models performed poorly. The proportions of trait and method variance in ratings were related to several rating system characteristics such as opportunity for raters to observe ratees and basing rating dimensions on a job analysis. Performance of all three models was better with larger proportions of trait variance and smaller proportions of method variance.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 97 citations exist upstream.

References

1989LISREL 7 : user's reference guide 1988Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size.1993Personnel Selection in Organizations 1989Lack of method variance in self-reported affect and perceptions at work: Reality or artifact?1979Correlation and causality 1990Choosing a multivariate model: Noncentrality and goodness of fit.1988A META‐ANALYSIS OF SELF‐SUPERVISOR, SELF‐PEER, AND PEER‐SUPERVISOR RATINGS 1985Hierarchically Nested Covariance Structure Models for Multitrait-Multimethod Data

Cited by

2004Method Variance and Method Bias in Industrial and Organizational Psychology 2000Assessment Center Exercise Factors Represent Cross-Situational Specificity, Not Method Bias 2008Rater source factors represent important subcomponents of the criterion construct space, not rater bias 2003A FIELD STUDY OF THE EFFECTS OF RATING PURPOSE ON THE QUALITY OF MULTISOURCE RATINGS 2005Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A multitrait-multirater approach.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.