Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Personal attributes of authors and reviewers, social bias and the outcomes of peer review: a case study

16 references·14 citing·39 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1997Nepotism and sexism in peer-review1,346 cited
1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
2012Bias in peer review997 cited
2013Who's Afraid of Peer Review?934 cited
2006Peer review: a flawed process at the heart of science and journals794 cited
2011Scientific peer review563 cited
2007Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors551 cited
2007Gender differences in grant peer review: A meta-analysis336 cited
1998US and Non-US Submissions318 cited
2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
2008Improving the peer-review process for grant applications: Reliability, validity, bias, and generalizability.299 cited
2007The ups and downs of peer review296 cited
2004Effects of training on quality of peer review: randomised controlled trial268 cited
1997Peer review for journals: Evidence on quality control, fairness, and innovation262 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2006Effect of Blinded Peer Review on Abstract Acceptance250 cited

Cited by

2021Classification and analysis of PubPeer comments: How a web journal club is used38 cited
2021Considerations for improving diversity, equity and inclusivity within research designs and teams36 cited
2018Peer Review of Reviewers: The Author’s Perspective31 cited
2021Publication bias is the consequence of a lack of diversity, equity, and inclusion30 cited
2017Gender and research funding success: Case of the Belgian F.R.S.-FNRS23 cited
2022Promoting equity in the peer review process of journal publication20 cited
2021Knowledge syntheses in medical education: Meta-research examining author gender, geographic location, and institutional affiliation19 cited
2023Reviewer training for improving grant and journal peer review17 cited
2022The consistency of peer-reviewers: Assessment of separate parts of the manuscripts vs final recommendations15 cited
2018Reviewer selection biases editorial decisions on manuscripts15 cited
2019Rebels with a Cause? Supporting Library and Academic-led Open Access Publishing14 cited
2022Inequity in Peer Review in Communication Sciences and Disorders12 cited
2017Addressing Reproducibility: Peer Review, Impact Factors, Checklists, Guidelines, and Reproducibility Initiatives11 cited
2019Double‐blind peer review—An experiment11 cited