SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Intraexaminer Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review
16 references·7 citing·43 second hop
Intraexaminer Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry in the Upper Extremity: A Systematic Review (2014)Intraexaminer Reliability of Hand-Held Dy…QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2011)QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for …Hand‐held Dynamometry Correlation With the Gold Standard Isokinetic Dynamometry: A Systematic Review (2011)Hand‐held Dynamometry Correla…The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL) (2010)The development of a quality …Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reli…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for…Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for…Health Measurement Scales (2008)Health Measurement ScalesWhen to use agreement versus reliability measures (2006)When to use agreement versus …Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration (2003)The STARD Statement for Repor…Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria (1996)Evaluating quality-of-life an…Hand-held Dynamometer Measurements: Tester Strength Makes a Difference (1991)Hand-held Dynamometer Measure…Intrarater Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing and Hand-held Dynametric Muscle Testing (1987)Intrarater Reliability of Man…Interrater Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry (1987)Interrater Reliability of Han…Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. (1979)Intraclass correlations: Uses…Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength (2024)Variability between Different…Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of knee extensor strength measured by a novel device incorporated into a weight stack machine vs. handheld and isokinetic dynamometry (2024)Test-retest reliability and c…Reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for assessing lower limb muscle strength (2021)Reliability and validity of h…Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Strength Measurements Using a Pull Hand-Held Dynamometer Fixed to the Examiner’s Body and Comparison with Push Dynamometry (2021)Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliab…Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength (2020)Reliability and Validity of a…CORP: Measurement of upper and lower limb muscle strength and voluntary activation (2018)CORP: Measurement of upper an…Reliability of muscle strength measures obtained with a hand‐held dynamometer in an elderly population (2015)Reliability of muscle strengt…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews (1994)Empirical Evidence of Design-Related Bias in Studies of Diagnostic Tests (1999)REporting recommendations for tumour MARKer prognostic studies (REMARK) (2005)A catalogue of reporting guidelines for health research (2009)Measures of Diagnostic Accuracy: Basic Definitions. (2009)The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data (1977)Measuring agreement in method comparison studies (1999)Interrater agreement and interrater reliability: Key concepts, approaches, and applications (2012)SANRA—a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles (2019)STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT (1986)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. (1996)The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed (2011)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)Analysing and Presenting Results (2010)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)PRISMA Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR): Checklist and Explanation (2018)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)Coefficient Alpha and the Internal Structure of Tests (1951)Statistical principles in experimental design. (1962)Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores (1969)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The job demands-resources model of burnout. (2001)A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research (2016)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires (2006)Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross‐cultural health care research: a clear and user‐friendly guideline (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement83,813 cited
  • 2009Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.44,857 cited
  • 1979Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability.23,882 cited
  • 2009Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement19,577 cited
  • 2011QUADAS-2: A Revised Tool for the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies14,163 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2008Health Measurement Scales2,628 cited
  • 2010Guidelines for Reporting Reliability and Agreement Studies (GRRAS) were proposed2,206 cited
  • 2006When to use agreement versus reliability measures1,794 cited
  • 2003The STARD Statement for Reporting Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: Explanation and Elaboration1,124 cited
  • 2011Hand‐held Dynamometry Correlation With the Gold Standard Isokinetic Dynamometry: A Systematic Review820 cited
  • 1996Evaluating quality-of-life and health status instruments: development of scientific review criteria591 cited
  • 2010The development of a quality appraisal tool for studies of diagnostic reliability (QAREL)375 cited
  • 1987Interrater Reliability of Hand-Held Dynamometry

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

315 cited
  • 1987Intrarater Reliability of Manual Muscle Testing and Hand-held Dynametric Muscle Testing314 cited
  • 1991Hand-held Dynamometer Measurements: Tester Strength Makes a Difference306 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Reliability of muscle strength measures obtained with a hand‐held dynamometer in an elderly population111 cited
    • 2018CORP: Measurement of upper and lower limb muscle strength and voluntary activation77 cited
    • 2021Intra- and Inter-Rater Reliability of Strength Measurements Using a Pull Hand-Held Dynamometer Fixed to the Examiner’s Body and Comparison with Push Dynamometry25 cited
    • 2024Variability between Different Hand-Held Dynamometers for Measuring Muscle Strength24 cited
    • 2021Reliability and validity of hand-held dynamometry for assessing lower limb muscle strength17 cited
    • 2024Test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of knee extensor strength measured by a novel device incorporated into a weight stack machine vs. handheld and isokinetic dynamometry13 cited
    • 2020Reliability and Validity of a Novel Wearable Device for Measuring Elbow Strength13 cited