Dirty Hands Make Dirty Leaders?! The Effects of Touching Dirty Objects on Rewarding Unethical Subordinates as a Function of a Leader’s Self-Interest

Florien M. Cramwinckel · David De Cremer · Marius van Dijke

27 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Business Ethics

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Ethics in Business and Education Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

Abstract

We studied the role of social dynamics in moral decision-making and behavior by investigating how physical sensations of dirtiness versus cleanliness influence moral behavior in leader–subordinate relationships, and whether a leader’s self-interest functions as a boundary condition to this effect. A pilot study ( N = 78) revealed that when participants imagined rewarding (vs. punishing) unethical behavior of a subordinate, they felt more dirty. Our main experiment ( N = 96) showed that directly manipulating dirtiness by allowing leaders to touch a dirty object (fake poop) led to more positive evaluations of, and higher bonuses for, unethical subordinates than touching a clean object (hygienic hand wipe). This effect, however, only emerged when the subordinate’s unethical behavior did not serve the leader’s own interest. Hence, subtle cues such as bodily sensations can shape moral decision-making and behavior in leader–subordinate relationships, but self-interest, as a core characteristic of interdependence, can override the influence of such cues on the leader’s moral behavior.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 27 citations exist upstream.

References

1995The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation.1992Universals in the Content and Structure of Values: Theoretical Advances and Empirical Tests in 20 Countries 2008Social psychology: handbook of basic principles 1991Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations: An Issue-Contingent Model 1996Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research 2003A Qualitative Investigation of Perceived Executive Ethical Leadership: Perceptions from Inside and Outside the Executive Suite 2000Moral Person and Moral Manager: How Executives Develop a Reputation for Ethical Leadership 2002Interdependence, Interaction, and Relationships

Cited by

2017The aura of charisma: A review on the embodiment perspective as signaling 2021How exploitative leadership influences on knowledge management processes: the moderating role of organisational citizenship behaviour 2022Algorithms, leadership, and morality: why a mere human effect drives the preference for human over algorithmic leadership 2017Compromised Ethics in Hiring Processes? How Referrers’ Power Affects Employees’ Reactions to Referral Practices

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.