SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking Behavior · Study

ArticleShelves

ArticleThe Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking Behavior

Richard Griffith2008

Article2008

The Failure of Social Desirability Measures to Capture Applicant Faking Behavior

Richard Griffith · Mitchell H. Peterson

87 citations·0/0 files stored·Industrial and Organizational Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Psychometric Methodologies and Testing Psychological Testing and Assessment Employer Branding and e-HRM

Abstract

No abstract was published for this record.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 87 citations exist upstream.

References

2015Methods of Meta-Analysis: Correcting Error and Bias in Research Findings 2004Methods of Meta-Analysis 2007Do applicants fake? An examination of the frequency of applicant faking behavior 2003Faking and selection: Considering the use of personality from select-in and select-out perspectives.2007A Closer Examination of Applicant Faking Behavior 2008Personality Testing and Industrial–Organizational Psychology: Reflections, Progress, and Prospects

Cited by

2016The Marlowe–Crowne Social Desirability Scale outperforms the BIDR Impression Management Scale for identifying fakers 2015A Meta‐Analytic Multitrait Multirater Separation of Substance and Style in Social Desirability Scales 2016Impression Management and Social Media Profiles 2015“F*** You, I Won’t Do What You Told Me!” – Response Biases as Threats to Psychological Assessment 2015What Is the Nature of Faking? Modeling Distinct Response Patterns and Quantitative Differences in Faking at the Same Time 2016Is Policy Capturing Really More Resistant Than Traditional Self-Report Techniques to Socially Desirable Responding?

Related works

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

2014Interventions for Addressing Faking on Personality Assessments for Employee Selection: A Meta-Analysisarticle · 5 shared references 2011Applicant Faking, Social Desirability, and the Prediction of Counterproductive Work Behaviorsarticle · 4 shared references 2021A Meta-Analysis of the Faking Resistance of Forced-Choice Personality Inventoriesreview · 4 shared references 2022Valence, Instrumentality, Expectancy, and Ability as Determinants of Faking, and the Effects of Faking on Criterion-Related Validityarticle · 4 shared references 2007PERSONALITY TESTS AT THE CROSSROADS: A RESPONSE TO MORGESON, CAMPION, DIPBOYE, HOLLENBECK, MURPHY, AND SCHMITT (2007)article · 3 shared references 2006Using the BIDR to Distinguish the Effects of Impression Management and Self-Deception on the Criterion Validity of Personality Measures: A Meta-Analysisreview · 3 shared references

Details

Year2008

Typearticle

Published2008-09-01

VenueIndustrial and Organizational Psychology

ISSN-L1754-9426

Languageen

Citations87

Files0 public / 0

ShelfPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Identifiers

doi10.1111/j.1754-9434.2008.00053.x

openalex_workW2109413822

Links

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.

2014

Using Blatant Extreme Responding for Detecting Faking in High‐stakes Selection: Construct validity, relationship with general mental ability, and subgroup differences

2016Practitioner mentoring of undergraduate accounting students: helping prepare students to become accounting professionals