Mingling Decision Making Metaphors

Abstract

Organizational decisions provide conceptual playing fields wherein scientists adhering to rival theories based on different metaphors skirmish in-decisively. Organizational decisions, however, are also empirical arenas wherein practitioners espousing discordant theories-in-use reconcile their differences pragmatically. Practitioners' decision-making metaphors encountered while studying capital budgeting suggest how disjoint perspectives are assimilated and shifts from instrumental to symbolic actions are triggered. Implications for decision theories are discussed, and potential benefits of incorporating practitioners' knowledge into organizational science are considered.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 84 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.