Power, skill and virtue in the Old EnglishBoethius

Abstract

In Alfred's famousPrefaceto his translation of theRegula pastoralis, the king writes that he translated ‘hwilum word be worde, hwilum andgit of andgiete’ (7.19–20); a similar phrase occurs in the proem to theBoethius(1.2–3). Yet words in different languages are rarely exact equivalents. Translators select words which they feel capture the primary sense of source words and match secondary meanings and connotations only if they can. Similarities between two terms in different languages can reveal where the conceptual systems of the source and target cultures overlap and which denotations and connotations of a complex word were most important to the translator. Differences can indicate how cultures differ and what other conceptual systems might have influenced the translator. In a well-established system of translation, certain terms become accepted as standard equivalents to particular terms in other languages. Alfred, however, was in the position not of employing accepted equivalidents but of trying to create them. By the time he worked on theBoethius, Wærferth had probably translated Gregory'sDialogi, and Alfred's ownRegula pastoraliswas most likely complete, but no other models were availabel. As one of the earliest Anglo-Saxon translators, producing translations of theDe consolatione, Gregory'sRegula pastoralis, Augustine'sSoliloquiaand the first fifty psalms, Alfred had to solve translation problems himself.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 5 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.