Articlegreen2013

Public relations and neo-institutional theory

Magnus Fredriksson · Josef Pallas · Stefan Wehmeier

66 citations0/0 files storedPublic Relations Inquiry

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Management and Organizational Studies Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Public Relations and Crisis Communication

Abstract

The article introduces a special section on public relations and neo-institutional theory where we seek to enrich research on public relations by using neo-institutional theory to describe, explain and understand the activities, processes and dynamics of the practice. By this we open up for a wider understanding of public relations, its preconditions, its performances and its consequences for shaping the social. The article starts with a discussion on earlier work in the tradition of neo-institutional theory where a lot of attention was paid to the governing mechanisms of institutions and how they control the behavior of actors. A perspective leading to some fundamental challenges where the primary objection was the over-determinism neo-institutional researchers ascribed to institutions. Taking these objectives seriously we follow more recent developments and present three streams of research – institutional logics, translation and institutional work – where agency is given a more profound role. We argue for how an employment of the logic can help us gain a more insightful understanding of public relations and communication as an institutional practice; how public relations functions as a carrier and translator of institutions; and how public relations is used to challenge and re-shape the foundations on which social actors interact with each other. We argue that public relations could be analyzed as an institutionalized practice with certain set of governing mechanisms including taken-for-granted activities, rules, norms and ideas. One argument for a neo-institutional perspective is the importance it gives communication in the understanding of organizations, institutions and society. Another argument is recent developments where public relations and other forms of organizational communication have been examined as a major dimension of organizing in some of the more profound works among neo-institutional theorists.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 66 citations exist upstream.

References

1983The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields 1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 2004The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields 1995Managing Legitimacy: Strategic and Institutional Approaches 1967The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge.1996Sensemaking in Organizations 1984Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay 1992The new institutionalism in organizational analysis

Cited by

2019Corporate diplomacy and political CSR: Similarities, differences and theoretical implications 2024Corruption prevention practices and tax avoidance: The moderating effect of corporate board characteristics 2014Crisis communication as institutional maintenance 2014Toward an historically informed Asian model of public relations 2020The articulation of ‘agency’: How can public relations scholarship and institutional theory enrich each other?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.