Hypotheses in Marketing Science: Literature Review and Publication AuditJ. Scott Armstrong, Roderick J. Brodie, Andrew Grant Parsons2001-05-01articleMarketing Letters124 citationsgreenNo readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.Business Strategies and Management ResearchPsychology Research and BibliometricsBusiness and Management StudiesAbstractNo abstract was published for this record.Citations in this libraryStored only when both papers are in the corpus — 124 citations exist upstream.References1979Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence.1960On the Failure to Eliminate Hypotheses in a Conceptual Task1987Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing.1965The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1969Illusory correlation as an obstacle to the use of valid psychodiagnostic signs.1999Attribute-Level Performance, Satisfaction, and Behavioral Intentions over Time: A Consumption-System Approach1994How Scientists Really Reason: Scientific Reasoning in Real-World LaboratoriesCited by2017Board Structure to Enhance Social Responsibility Development: A Qualitative Comparative Analysis of US Companies2016Are Formal Planners More Likely To Achieve New Venture Viability? A Counterfactual Model And Analysis