Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Public preferences for sentencing purposes: What difference does offender age, criminal history and offence type make?

15 references·2 citing·41 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2005Sentencing and Criminal Justice283 cited
1996Americans View Crime and Justice: A National Public Opinion Survey227 cited
2014Penal populism, sentencing councils and sentencing policy75 cited
2009Public attitudes to sentencing purposes and sentencing factors: an empirical analysis66 cited
1996Determinants of public punitiveness toward drunk driving: A factorial survey approach65 cited
2008Punishing Persistent OffendersExploring Community and Offender Perspectives64 cited
2007Public Attitudes to Sentencing in Canada: Exploring Recent Findings61 cited
2004Public Opinion and Youth Justice61 cited
2002Sentencing Juvenile Offenders: Comparing Public Preferences and Judicial Practice57 cited
2011Custody or community? Exploring the boundaries of public punitiveness in England and Wales51 cited
2000Transforming the punishment environment: Understanding public views of what should be accomplished at sentencing50 cited
1987Public perception of sentencing in Perth, Western Australia47 cited
2005How Judges Sentence37 cited
2005Sentencing young offenders33 cited
2011A country not divided: A comparison of public punitiveness and confidence in sentencing across Australia

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

28 cited

Cited by

2014Stakeholder Sentencing21 cited
2017Why sentence? Comparing the views of jurors, judges and the legislature on the purposes of sentencing in Victoria, Australia15 cited