SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The Role of Death Qualification in Jurors' Susceptibility to Pretrial Publicity1
16 references·3 citing·48 second hop
The Role of Death Qualification in Jurors' Susceptibility to Pretrial Publicity1 (2007)The Role of Death Qualification in Jurors…The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials (2007)The impact of death qualifica…Death by design: capital punishment as social psychological system (2006)Death by design: capital puni…The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials. (2002)The role of death qualificati…Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty. (2000)Discrimination and instructio…The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review. (1999)The effects of pretrial publi…Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases. (1995)Comprehensibility of approved…The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments. (1994)The biasing impact of pretria…"Modern" death qualification: New data on its biasing effects. (1994)"Modern" death qualification:…Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges. (1993)Instructing on death: Psychol…A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity1 (1992)A Test of Voir Dire as a Reme…The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity1 (1991)The Prejudicial Impact of Pre…Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment. (1986)Neither "tentative" nor "frag…The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity. (1984)The death-qualified jury and …On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process. (1984)On the selection of capital j…Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes. (1984)Due process vs. crime control…Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts. (1984)Death penalty attitudes and c…Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes (2016)Capital-izing Jurors: How Dea…Death Qualification as Systematic Exclusion of Jurors With Certain Religious and Other Characteristics (2010)Death Qualification as System…Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process (2007)Death qualification and preju…Development of an empathy scale. (1969)Measures of Social Psychological Attitudes. (1976)Factors Affecting Response Rates to Mailed Questionnaires: A Quantitative Analysis of the Published Literature (1978)Individual Differences in Attitudes Relevant to Juror Decision Making: Development and Validation of the Pretrial Juror Attitude Questionnaire (PJAQ) 1 (2008)Societal threat, authoritarianism, conservatism, and U.S. state death penalty sentencing (1977-2004). (2008)The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion (1986)Prejudice, Discrimination and Racism (1988)Subtle and blatant prejudice in western Europe (1995)Does Racism Harm Health? Did Child Abuse Exist Before 1962? On Explicit Questions, Critical Science, and Current Controversies: An Ecosocial Perspective (2003)Why Do White Americans Support the Death Penalty? (2003)The impact of mental health evidence on support for capital punishment: are defendants labeled psychopathic considered more deserving of death? (2005)Person memory: Personality traits as organizing principles in memory for behaviors. (1979)Juror decision making: The importance of evidence. (1987)Pretrial publicity, judicial remedies, and jury bias. (1990)Inadmissible Testimony, Instructions to Disregard, and the Jury: Substantive Versus Procedural Considerations (1997)Understanding the limits of limiting instructions: Social psychological explanations for the failures of instructions to disregard pretrial publicity and other inadmissible evidence. (2000)Understanding Pretrial Publicity: Predecisional Distortion of Evidence by Mock Jurors. (2004)Inside the Jury (1983)The effects of death qualification on jurors' predisposition to convict and on the quality of deliberation. (1984)Pretrial publicity: The media, the law, and common sense. (1997)Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them (2009)Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions (1979)The Psychology of Evidence and Trial Procedure (1985)Experimental Design: Procedures for the Behavioral Sciences (2013)A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance (1957)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Frontloading Mitigation: The “Legal” and the “Human” in Death Penalty Defense (2010)Jurors’ discussions of a defendant’s history of child abuse and alcohol abuse in capital sentencing deliberations. (2010)The susceptible circle: A taxonomy of followers associated with destructive leadership (2012)The Handbook of Social Psychology (1969)Meta-Analytic Procedures for Social Research. (1994)ATTITUDES AND ATTITUDE CHANGE (1997)Psychology and Law: Truthfulness, Accuracy and Credibility (2000)Eyewitness accuracy rates in sequential and simultaneous lineup presentations: A meta-analytic comparison. (2001)The Impact on Juror Verdicts of Judicial Instruction to Disregard Inadmissible Evidence: A Meta-Analysis. (2006)Nature of Prejudice (1954)Attitude-behavior relations: A theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. (1977)Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. (1979)Juror decision making, attitudes, and the hindsight bias. (1989)Exploring the effects of attitudes toward the death penalty on capital sentencing verdicts. (2004)Gold versus platinum: Do jurors recognize the superiority and limitations of DNA evidence compared to other types of forensic evidence? (2008)Forming impressions of personality. (1946)FORMING IMPRESSIONS OF PERSONALITY (1961)Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior (1987)Race and the decision making of juries (2007)A meta-analysis of the association between authoritarianism and jurors' perceptions of defendant culpability. (1993)Autocratic leaders and authoritarian followers revisited: A review and agenda for the future (2017)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1999The effects of pretrial publicity on juror verdicts: A meta-analytic review.180 cited
  • 1984Due process vs. crime control: Death qualification and jury attitudes.176 cited
  • 2000Discrimination and instructional comprehension: Guided discretion, racial bias, and the death penalty.136 cited
  • 1984Death penalty attitudes and conviction proneness: The translation of attitudes into verdicts.132 cited
  • 1994The biasing impact of pretrial publicity on juror judgments.107 cited
  • 1984On the selection of capital juries: The biasing effects of the death-qualification process.99 cited
  • 1986Neither "tentative" nor "fragmentary": Verdict preference of impaneled felony jurors as a function of attitude toward capital punishment.88 cited
  • 1991The Prejudicial Impact of Pretrial Publicity188 cited
  • 1995Comprehensibility of approved jury instructions in capital murder cases.84 cited
  • 2007The impact of death qualification, belief in a just world, legal authoritarianism, and locus of control on venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials78 cited
  • 1992A Test of Voir Dire as a Remedy for the Prejudicial Effects of Pretrial Publicity174 cited
  • 2006Death by design: capital punishment as social psychological system71 cited
  • 1984The death-qualified jury and the defense of insanity.69 cited
  • 1993

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Instructing on death: Psychologists, juries, and judges.
67 cited
  • 2002The role of death qualification in venirepersons' evaluations of aggravating and mitigating circumstances in capital trials.61 cited
  • 1994"Modern" death qualification: New data on its biasing effects.60 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Capital-izing Jurors: How Death Qualification Relates to Jury Composition, Jurors’ Perceptions, and Trial Outcomes23 cited
    • 2010Death Qualification as Systematic Exclusion of Jurors With Certain Religious and Other Characteristics19 cited
    • 2007Death qualification and prejudice: the effect of implicit racism, sexism, and homophobia on capital defendants' right to due process17 cited