SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Declaración de transparencia para las publicaciones científicas
16 references·0 citing·49 second hop
Declaración de transparencia para las publicaciones científicas (2014)Declaración de transparencia para las pub…Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Reducing waste from incomplet…Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review (2013)Systematic Review of the Empi…Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension (2013)Reporting of harms data in RC…Declaration of transparency for each research article (2013)Declaration of transparency f…Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals (2012)Misconduct Policies in High-I…Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications (2012)Misconduct accounts for the m…Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa (2012)Does use of the CONSORT State…Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008 (2011)Why and how do journals retra…Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial (2011)Effect of using reporting gui…The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed (2010)The quality of reports of ran…The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews (2010)The impact of outcome reporti…Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes (2010)Reporting and Interpretation …Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis (2010)Declaración PRISMA: una propu…Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews (2007)Epidemiology and Reporting Ch…Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies (2007)Editorial peer review for imp…Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals (2005)Epidemiology and reporting of…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)La extensión de la declaración PRISMA para revisiones sistemáticas que incorporan metaanálisis en red: PRISMA-NMA (2016)Women Entrepreneurship: A Systematic Review to Outline the Boundaries of Scientific Literature (2020)Between Level Up and Game Over: A Systematic Literature Review of Gamification in Education (2021)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context (2000)Publication Bias in Meta‐Analysis (2005)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies (PRISMA-DTA): explanation, elaboration, and checklist (2020)PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews (2020)The Hong Kong Principles for assessing researchers: Fostering research integrity (2020)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)STARD 2015: An Updated List of Essential Items for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (2015)The COMET Handbook: version 1.0 (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trial reports for interventions involving artificial intelligence: the CONSORT-AI extension (2020)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias (2008)Does Cultural Competency Training of Health Professionals Improve Patient Outcomes? A Systematic Review and Proposed Algorithm for Future Research (2010)Retractions in the scientific literature: is the incidence of research fraud increasing? (2010)Evolution of Reporting P Values in the Biomedical Literature, 1990-2015 (2016)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)CONSORT 2010 Statement (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. (2010)Effect of Preventive Interventions in Mentally Ill Parents on the Mental Health of the Offspring: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2011)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Evaluation of the Endorsement of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) Statement on the Quality of Published Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses (2013)Systematic literature review of built environment effects on physical activity and active transport – an update and new findings on health equity (2017)Scientists behaving badly (2005)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data (2009)Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank (2013)Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased? (2013)Academic Research in the 21st Century: Maintaining Scientific Integrity in a Climate of Perverse Incentives and Hypercompetition (2016)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement (2013)Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS)—Explanation and Elaboration: A Report of the ISPOR Health Economic Evaluation Publication Guidelines Good Reporting Practices Task Force (2013)A taxonomy of behaviour change methods: an Intervention Mapping approach (2015)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Evolution of Heterogeneity (I2) Estimates and Their 95% Confidence Intervals in Large Meta-Analyses (2012)The secret lives of experiments: Methods reporting in the fMRI literature (2012)The CONSORT statement (2019)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis1,370 cited
  • 2014Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research1,315 cited
  • 2012Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications1,231 cited
  • 2010The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews1,133 cited
  • 2013Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias — An Updated Review1,126 cited
  • 2007Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews891 cited
  • 2010Reporting and Interpretation of Randomized Controlled Trials With Statistically Nonsignificant Results for Primary Outcomes828 cited
  • 2012Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa628 cited
  • 2010The quality of reports of randomised trials in 2000 and 2006: comparative study of articles indexed in PubMed503 cited
  • 2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
  • 2007Editorial peer review for improving the quality of reports of biomedical studies312 cited
  • 2011Effect of using reporting guidelines during peer review on quality of final manuscripts submitted to a biomedical journal: masked randomised trial291 cited
  • 2011Why and how do journals retract articles? An analysis of Medline retractions 1988–2008

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

263 cited
  • 2013Reporting of harms data in RCTs: a systematic review of empirical assessments against the CONSORT harms extension111 cited
  • 2012Misconduct Policies in High-Impact Biomedical Journals108 cited
  • 2013Declaration of transparency for each research article90 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.