SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane review authors
13 references·4 citing·44 second hop
Use of indirect comparison methods in systematic reviews: a survey of Cochrane review authors (2011)Use of indirect comparison methods in sys…Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study (2011)Inconsistency between direct …Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality (2010)Indirect Comparisons: A Revie…Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment (2010)Authors' opinions on publicat…Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews (2009)Methodological problems in th…Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission (2009)Global survey of factors infl…Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis (2007)Validity of indirect comparis…Assessing the Utility of the Standards for Reporting Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): A Survey of Authors (2007)Assessing the Utility of the …Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials (2006)Indirect comparisons: the mes…Indirect comparisons of competing interventions (2005)Indirect comparisons of compe…Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons (2004)Combination of direct and ind…Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons (2002)Network meta‐analysis for ind…The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (1997)The results of direct and ind…BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS (1996)BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTER…Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews (2023)Guidance to best tools and pr…Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews (2023)Guidance to Best Tools and Pr…Use of network meta-analysis in systematic reviews: a survey of authors (2016)Use of network meta-analysis …What Guidance Are Researchers Given on How to Present Network Meta-Analyses to End-Users such as Policymakers and Clinicians? A Systematic Review (2014)What Guidance Are Researchers…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness (2011)Indirect and mixed‐treatment comparison, network, or multiple‐treatments meta‐analysis: many names, many benefits, many concerns for the next generation evidence synthesis tool (2012)CINeMA: An approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis (2020)Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Multiple treatment comparison meta-analyses: a step forward into complexity (2011)Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study (2014)The Role of Emotion Regulation in Eating Disorders: A Network Meta-Analysis Approach (2022)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)How should meta‐regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? (2002)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Analysis of the systematic reviews process in reports of network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review (2013)Characteristics of Networks of Interventions: A Description of a Database of 186 Published Networks (2014)Bibliographic study showed improving statistical methodology of network meta-analyses published between 1999 and 2015 (2016)Multiple Authorship (1998)The History and Meaning of the Journal Impact Factor (2006)Indexed Pain Journals (2008)Ongoing ethical issues concerning authorship in biomedical journals: an integrative review (2015)Imagining the “open” university: Sharing scholarship to improve research and education (2017)Indicators of research quality, quantity, openness, and responsibility in institutional review, promotion, and tenure policies across seven countries (2022)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Sample size and power considerations in network meta-analysis (2012)GRADE approach to rate the certainty from a network meta-analysis: avoiding spurious judgments of imprecision in sparse networks (2018)Most published meta-regression analyses based on aggregate data suffer from methodological pitfalls: a meta-epidemiological study (2021)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses (2009)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 4 (2013)10.1007/978-1-4899-4485-6 (2000)Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta‐analysis (2010)Graphical Tools for Network Meta-Analysis in STATA (2013)ROBIS: A new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed (2015)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Network meta-analysis-highly attractive but more methodological research is needed (2011)GetReal in network meta‐analysis: a review of the methodology (2016)BUGSnet: an R package to facilitate the conduct and reporting of Bayesian network Meta-analyses (2019)Recent developments in meta‐analysis (2007)Evaluation of inconsistency in networks of interventions (2013)A meta-analysis of procedures to change implicit measures. (2019)Consistency and inconsistency in network meta‐analysis: model estimation using multivariate meta‐regression (2012)Evidence Synthesis for Decision Making 2 (2012)Evaluating the Quality of Evidence from a Network Meta-Analysis (2014)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Combination of direct and indirect evidence in mixed treatment comparisons2,168 cited
  • 1997The results of direct and indirect treatment comparisons in meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials2,052 cited
  • 2002Network meta‐analysis for indirect treatment comparisons1,204 cited
  • 2005Indirect comparisons of competing interventions680 cited
  • 1996BORROWING STRENGTH FROM EXTERNAL TRIALS IN A META-ANALYSIS560 cited
  • 2009Methodological problems in the use of indirect comparisons for evaluating healthcare interventions: survey of published systematic reviews395 cited
  • 2011Inconsistency between direct and indirect comparisons of competing interventions: meta-epidemiological study200 cited
  • 2010Indirect Comparisons: A Review of Reporting and Methodological Quality145 cited
  • 2006Indirect comparisons: the mesh and mess of clinical trials94 cited
  • 2010Authors' opinions on publication in relation to annual performance assessment85 cited
  • 2007Assessing the Utility of the Standards for Reporting Trials of Acupuncture (STRICTA): A Survey of Authors40 cited
  • 2009Global survey of factors influencing choice of surgical journal for manuscript submission38 cited
  • 2007Validity of indirect comparisons in meta-analysis36 cited

Cited by

  • 2023Guidance to best tools and practices for systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

20 cited
  • 2023Guidance to Best Tools and Practices for Systematic Reviews17 cited
  • 2014What Guidance Are Researchers Given on How to Present Network Meta-Analyses to End-Users such as Policymakers and Clinicians? A Systematic Review16 cited
  • 2016Use of network meta-analysis in systematic reviews: a survey of authors15 cited