Exploring the antecedents of preferential customer treatment by suppliers: a mixed methods approach

Lisa Hüttinger · Holger Schiele · Dennis Schröer

81 citations0/0 files storedSupply Chain Management An International Journal

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Quality and Supply Management Customer Service Quality and Loyalty Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management

Abstract

Purpose – This paper aims to understand the factors that influence a supplier’s choice to treat selected customers more preferentially than others. Suppliers often lack the resources to treat all their customers equally, instead having to make choices to treat some customers as preferred. Empirical evidence indicates that preferential treatment by suppliers provides substantial benefits for the purchasing firm. Design/methodology/approach – This study applies a mixed-methods approach. First, a qualitative analysis of a sample of buyers from an automotive manufacturer was conducted. In the second step, the findings were triangulated via a quantitative survey among key account managers of the automotive firm’s suppliers. Findings – This paper is the first to provide quantitative data collected from a large sample of automotive suppliers about the drivers of preferential customer treatment. The authors were able to show that the growth opportunities for suppliers and customers’ operative excellence, reliability and relational behavior are factors that induce suppliers to award preferential customer treatment. In contrast, innovation potential for suppliers, customers’ support of suppliers, supplier involvement and contact accessibility do not show a significant effect on suppliers’ behavioral intentions toward preferential customer treatment. Originality/value – The mixed-methods approach is introduced as a form of academic enquiry in supply chain management. The factors influencing preferential customer treatment by suppliers are explored in discussions with purchasers and validated in a subsequent survey among suppliers. Recommendations for managerial practice and theory are drawn.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 81 citations exist upstream.

References

1981Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error 2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1992A power primer.1988On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models 2007Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research 1994The Commitment-Trust Theory of Relationship Marketing 2011PLS-SEM: Indeed a Silver Bullet 1986Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects

Cited by

2015The impact of customer attractiveness and supplier satisfaction on becoming a preferred customer 2021The “research world café” as method of scientific enquiry: Combining rigor with relevance and speed 2020Artificial Intelligence in Purchasing: Facilitating Mechanism Design-based Negotiations 2016Supplier satisfaction: Explanation and out-of-sample prediction 2015Managing Supplier Satisfaction: Social Capital and Resource Dependence Frameworks

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.