Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Studies Using Generalized Linear Mixed Models

16 references·16 citing·45 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2005Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews3,362 cited
2001Systematic Reviews in Health Care1,692 cited
2002Advanced methods in meta‐analysis: multivariate approach and meta‐regression1,582 cited
2001A hierarchical regression approach to meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy evaluations1,509 cited
2006A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies752 cited
2006Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approach709 cited
2002Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data673 cited
2002Asymmetric funnel plots and publication bias in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy486 cited
2007The binomial distribution of meta-analysis was preferred to model within-study variability387 cited
2008Bivariate Random Effects Meta-Analysis of ROC Curves325 cited
2007Bivariate random-effects meta-analysis and the estimation of between-study correlation244 cited
2005The partial area under the summary ROC curve240 cited
2004Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis209 cited
2007We should not pool diagnostic likelihood ratios in systematic reviews

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

207 cited

2007An alternative model for bivariate random-effects meta-analysis when the within-study correlations are unknown167 cited

1999Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Tests With Imperfect Reference Standards112 cited

Cited by

2010Bivariate random effects models for meta-analysis of comparative studies with binary outcomes: Methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk78 cited
2013Statistical methods for multivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic tests: An overview and tutorial66 cited
2013Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulas65 cited
2012A mixed model approach to meta-analysis of diagnostic studies with binary test outcome.54 cited
2021Empirical Comparisons of 12 Meta-analysis Methods for Synthesizing Proportions of Binary Outcomes51 cited
2020New measures improved the reporting of heterogeneity in diagnostic test accuracy reviews: a metaepidemiological study47 cited
2015A mixed effect model for bivariate meta‐analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution45 cited
2018The Evaluation of Bivariate Mixed Models in Meta-analyses of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies with SAS, Stata and R42 cited
2018meta4diag: Bayesian Bivariate Meta-Analysis of Diagnostic Test Studies for Routine Practice40 cited
2018Bivariate random‐effects meta‐analysis models for diagnostic test accuracy studies using arcsine‐based transformations39 cited
2014Meta-analysis of Proportions of Rare Events–A Comparison of Exact Likelihood Methods with Robust Variance Estimation36 cited
2014A composite likelihood method for bivariate meta-analysis in diagnostic systematic reviews31 cited
2015Meta‐analysis of studies with bivariate binary outcomes: a marginal beta‐binomial model approach22 cited
2014Performance measures of the bivariate random effects model for meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy21 cited
2014Latent class bivariate model for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies20 cited
2015Meta‐analysis of diagnostic tests accounting for disease prevalence: a new model using trivariate copulas20 cited