SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ABBREVIATED AND STANDARD PORTLAND DIGIT RECOGNITION TEST
9 references·1 citing·30 second hop
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ABBREVIATED AND STANDARD PORTLAND DIGIT RECOGNITION TEST (2005)AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ABBREVIATED AND STA…Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration (2002)Base Rates of Malingering and…Symptom Validity Testing: A Critical Review (2001)Symptom Validity Testing: A C…Identification of Malingered Head Injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – 3rd Edition (2001)Identification of Malingered …Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research (1999)Diagnostic Criteria for Malin…Portland Digit Recognition Test Performance by Brain Dysfunction Patients without Financial Incentives (1996)Portland Digit Recognition Te…Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. (1994)Validation of malingered amne…Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample. (1994)Validation of malingered amne…An abbreviated form of the portland digit recognition test (1993)An abbreviated form of the po…Assesment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma. (1991)Assesment of motivation after…Portland Digit Recognition Test (1991)Portland Digit Recognition Te…Category norms of verbal items in 56 categories A replication and extension of the Connecticut category norms. (1969)Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (2003)Ethical Issues Associated With the Assessment of Exaggeration, Poor Effort, and Malingering (2006)Detecting Malingering in Traumatic Brain Injury and Chronic Pain: A Comparison of Three Forced-Choice Symptom Validity Tests (2008)Research methods in performance validity testing studies: Criterion grouping approach impacts study outcomes (2018)WAIS-R manual : Wechsler adult intelligence scale-revised (1981)Clinical assessment of malingering and deception (1988)The Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM): Normative data from cognitively intact and cognitively impaired individuals. (1997)Five validation experiments of the Test of Memory Malingering (TOMM). (1998)Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. (1955)Prospects for faking believable deficits on neuropsychological testing. (1978)Neuropsychological assessment, 3rd ed. (1995)Detection of Malingering Using Atypical Performance Patterns on Standard Neuropsychological Tests (2003)A Standardized Memory Scale for Clinical Use (1945)Neuropsychological Assessment, 2nd Ed (1985)Aggregation Across Multiple Indicators Improves the Detection of Malingering: Relationship to Likelihood Ratios (2008)A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests (1991)Neuropsychological Assessment (1994)Detecting Exaggeration and Malingering in Neuropsychological Assessment (2000)Base Rates of Negative Response Bias and Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction among Criminal Defendants Referred for Neuropsychological Evaluation (2007)Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering (1989)Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee (2005)Neuropsychological assessment and malingering: A critical review of past and present strategies (1994)Malingering response styles on the memory assessment scales and symptom validity tests (1995)MMPI-2 validity scales versus domain specific measures in detection of factitious traumatic brain injury (1995)On the diagnosis of malingered pain-related disability: lessons from cognitive malingering research (2005)Sensitivity and Specificity of Various Digit Span Scores in the Detection of Suspect Effort (2006)Neuropsychologists’ Validity Testing Beliefs and Practices: A Survey of North American Professionals (2015)American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering (2009)American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology (AACN) 2021 consensus statement on validity assessment: Update of the 2009 AACN consensus conference statement on neuropsychological assessment of effort, response bias, and malingering (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2002Base Rates of Malingering and Symptom Exeggeration999 cited
  • 1999Diagnostic Criteria for Malingered Neurocognitive Dysfunction: Proposed Standards for Clinical Practice and Research970 cited
  • 1994Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample.641 cited
  • 1994Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample.570 cited
  • 1991Assesment of motivation after financially compensable minor head trauma.274 cited
  • 2001Symptom Validity Testing: A Critical Review222 cited
  • 2001Identification of Malingered Head Injury on the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale – 3rd Edition91 cited
  • 1996Portland Digit Recognition Test Performance by Brain Dysfunction Patients without Financial Incentives53 cited
  • 1993An abbreviated form of the portland digit recognition test49 cited

Cited by

  • 1991Portland Digit Recognition Test4 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work