Altering Curricula through State Testing: Perceptions of Teachers and Principals.

Abstract

Educators' perceptions of the effects of state mandated testing on instructional practices and curricular decisions were studied. An ethnographic interview study was conducted with 30 fifthand sixth-grade teachers and 12 principals from Illinois, New York, and Tennessee. Forty-one of the 42 respondents agreed to have their interviews audiotaped. Schools in each state represented a variety of enrollments from low to high socioeconomic status and varied minority composition. Teachers generally agreed that reading and mathematics sections of the state mandated tests assessed skills that more closely matched their curricula than sections on language arts, science, or social studies. Teachers also reported altering the scope and sequence of the currIculum and eliminating concepts that were not covered on state tests. Participants also reported reluctance to use innovative instructional strategies and reported reliance on traditional instructional measures in the belief that these strategies would better prepare students for state tests. An overriding theme was the reported tine constraints imposed by the pressure associated with assuring successful student performance. There is a 21-item list of references. (SLD) *********************************************************************** * Reproductions supplied by EDRS are the best that can be made * * from the original document. * *********************************************************************** t; 4 UAL DEPARTMENT OP EDUCAMN Office of Educatroosi Rewire, am improvement ZDUCATIONAL RESOURCES INFORMATION CENTER (ERIC) Id(his document has been reproduced as received born the person Or organization origrnaling if L Minor changes hare Poen madtt lo unPfave reproduction duality Paints at iiite* of a(tiruans stated rrus tIOCu men) do OM riefesSOMy tepre$011t Official Of Rt parfitian Or poUcy -PERMISSION TO REPRODUCE THIS MATERIAL HAS BEEN GRANTED BY

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 11 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.