Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

The effects of accomplice witnesses and jailhouse informants on jury decision making.

6 references·16 citing·49 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1977The Intuitive Psychologist And His Shortcomings: Distortions in the Attribution Process4,168 cited
1986College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature.2,050 cited
1995The correspondence bias.1,896 cited
2001On the Use of College Students in Social Science Research: Insights from a Second-Order Meta-analysis1,259 cited
1999The ecological validity of jury simulations: Is the jury still out?682 cited
2004The Psychology of Confessions520 cited

Cited by

2025Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations.171 cited
2012Why confessions trump innocence.151 cited
2008On the Presumption of Evidentiary Independence138 cited
2008False Confessions110 cited
2009Interviewing suspects: Practice, science, and future directions109 cited
2011Confessions That Corrupt102 cited
2009What do potential jurors know about police interrogation techniques and false confessions?98 cited
2011Police-induced confessions: an empirical analysis of their content and impact81 cited
2020Cumulative Disadvantage: A Psychological Framework for Understanding How Innocence Can Lead to Confession, Wrongful Conviction, and Beyond

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

77 cited

2015The Social Psychology of False Confessions76 cited

2013Comparing the effects of explicit and implicit false-evidence ploys on Mock Jurors' verdicts, sentencing recommendations, and perceptions of police interrogation76 cited

2010Police-induced confessions, risk factors, and recommendations: Looking ahead.72 cited

2016When self-report trumps science: Effects of confessions, DNA, and prosecutorial theories on perceptions of guilt.71 cited

2008The Psychology of Confessions67 cited

2010A paradigm shift in the analysis of bitemarks48 cited

2014Secondary confessions: The influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors’ perceptions of informant testimony.34 cited