Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Research on scientific journals: Implications for editors and authors

16 references·16 citing·39 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1967Management Misinformation Systems1,094 cited
1965The Method of Multiple Working Hypotheses1,071 cited
1982Peer-review practices of psychological journals: The fate of published articles, submitted again1,071 cited
1975Consequences of prejudice against the null hypothesis.1,022 cited
1977Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system1,013 cited
1959Publication Decisions and their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance—or Vice Versa964 cited
1971Patterns of evaluation in science: Institutionalisation, structure and functions of the referee system790 cited
1959Publication Decisions and Their Possible Effects on Inferences Drawn from Tests of Significance--Or Vice Versa524 cited
1961Resistance by Scientists to Scientific Discovery491 cited
1977On the psychology of experimental surprises.488 cited
1981The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less357 cited
1978The scientific publication system in social science247 cited
1970Industrial Democracy: The Sociology of Participation.246 cited
1977Manuscript Characteristics Which Influence Acceptance for Management and Social Science Journals245 cited
1978

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Editorial Policies and Practices Among Leading Journals in Four Scientific Fields

226 cited

1979Whatever happened to little Albert?224 cited

Cited by

1991The reliability of peer review for manuscript and grant submissions: A cross-disciplinary investigation496 cited
1984The citation bias: Fad and fashion in the judgment and decision literature.190 cited
1988Discovery-oriented psychotherapy research: Rationale, aims, and methods.176 cited
1982Barriers to scientific contributions: The author's formula152 cited
1986The value of formal planning for strategic decisions: Reply133 cited
2025The present and future of peer review: Ideas, interventions, and evidence89 cited
1988Research needs in forecasting76 cited
1985Evaluation of macroeconometric models74 cited
2010Quality and Peer Review of Research: An Adjudicating Role for Editors73 cited
2008Do editors and referees look for signs of scientific misconduct when reviewing manuscripts? A quantitative content analysis of studies that examined review criteria and reasons for accepting and rejecting manuscripts for publication66 cited
2010Writing and publishing important scientific articles: A reviewer's perspective65 cited
2010The predictive validity of peer review: A selective review of the judgmental forecasting qualities of peers, and implications for innovation in science58 cited
1982A physics editor comments on Peters and Ceci's peer-review study57 cited
1982The insufficiencies of methodological inadequacy56 cited
2008On what makes a significant contribution to the retailing literature56 cited
1991Reliability, fairness, objectivity and other inappropriate goals in peer review55 cited