Measuring oral proficiency in distance, face-to-face, and blended classrooms

Nicole L. Wilson · Maria Cetto · Cristina Pardo‐Ballester

185 citations0/0 files storedLanguage learning & technology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Online and Blended Learning English Language Learning and Teaching Foreign Language Teaching Methods

Abstract

Although the foreign-language profession routinely stresses the importance of technology for the curriculum, many teachers still harbor deep-seated doubts as to whether or not a hybrid course, much less a completely distance-learning class, could provide L2 learners with a way to reach linguistic proficiency, especially with respect to oral language skills.In this study, we examine the case of Spanish Without Walls (SWW), a first-year language course offered at the University of California -Davis in both hybrid and distance-learning formats.The SWW curriculum includes materials delivered via CD-ROM/DVD programs, online content-based web pages, and synchronous bimodal chat that includes sound and text.The contribution of each of these components is evaluated in the context of a successful technologically assisted course.To address the issue of oral proficiency, we compare the results from both classroom and distance-learning students who took the 20minute Versant for Spanish test, delivered by phone and automatically graded.The data generated by this instrument shows that classroom, hybrid, and distance L2 learners reach comparable levels of oral proficiency during their first year of study.Reference is also made to two other ongoing efforts to provide distance-learning courses in Arabic and Punjabi, two languages where special difficulties in their writing systems have an impact on the design of the distant-learning format.The rationale for offering language courses in either a hybrid or distance-learning format is examined in light of increasing societal pressures to help L2 learners reach advanced proficiency, especially in less commonly taught languages (LCTLs).

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 185 citations exist upstream.

References

1995Comparing Face-To-Face and Electronic Discussion in the Second Language Classroom 2003Developing L2 Oral Proficiency through Synchronous CMC: Output, Working Memory, and Interlanguage Development 1991Communicative language testing 1995Predictors of Foreign Language Gain During Study Abroad 2004Towards an Effective Use of Audio Conferencing in Distance Language Courses 2005Conversations—and negotiated interaction—in text and voice chat rooms 2003Who's Helping Whom?: Learner/Heritage-Speakers' Networked Discussions in Spanish 2005Synchronous CMC, Working Memory, and L2 Oral Proficiency Development

Cited by

2012Individual factors and successful learning in a hybrid course 2014Chapter 11. Evaluation of an online, task-based Chinese course 2021Motivation, self-efficacy beliefs, and speaking anxiety in language MOOCs 2014Computer-mediated communication (CMC) in L2 oral proficiency development: A meta-analysis 2021Evaluating the reading and listening outcomes of beginning‐level Duolingo courses

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.