Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Writing a research article that is "fit for purpose": EQUATOR Network and reporting guidelines

14 references·15 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials5,372 cited
2009Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence2,204 cited
2008Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting Bias1,544 cited
2009Publication bias in clinical trials due to statistical significance or direction of trial results897 cited
2006Does the CONSORT checklist improve the quality of reports of randomised controlled trials? A systematic review873 cited
1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
2008CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration670 cited
2008What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?613 cited
2005Epidemiology and reporting of randomised trials published in PubMed journals472 cited
2006"Brimful of STARLITE": toward standards for reporting literature searches.269 cited
2006The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement235 cited
2008Helping editors, peer reviewers and authors improve the clarity, completeness and transparency of reporting health research

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

153 cited

1989Multiple publication of reports of drug trials113 cited

Cited by

2017Compliance of systematic reviews in veterinary journals with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) literature search reporting guidelines58 cited
2010Assessment of the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews Published in the Urological Literature From 1998 to 200855 cited
2022Adherence to the PRISMA statement and its association with risk of bias in systematic reviews published in rehabilitation journals: A meta-research study53 cited
2014Importance of Transparent Reporting of Health Research43 cited
2011Do Journals Publishing in the Field of Urology Endorse Reporting Guidelines? A Survey of Author Instructions36 cited
2020Impact of a short version of the CONSORT checklist for peer reviewers to improve the reporting of randomised controlled trials published in biomedical journals: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial34 cited
2022Completeness of Reporting Is Suboptimal in Randomized Controlled Trials Published in Rehabilitation Journals, With Trials With Low Risk of Bias Displaying Better Reporting: A Meta-research Study32 cited
2019Health-Related Participatory Research in American Indian and Alaska Native Communities: A Scoping Review32 cited
2015Making research articles fit for purpose: structured reporting of key methods and findings28 cited
2016Research Reporting Guidelines in Dentistry: A Survey of Editors25 cited
2020Declaration of use and appropriate use of reporting guidelines in high-impact rehabilitation journals is limited: a meta-research study20 cited
2017The reporting characteristics of bovine respiratory disease clinical intervention trials published prior to and following publication of the REFLECT statement17 cited
2022Serious reporting deficiencies exist in minimal important difference studies: current state and suggestions for improvement17 cited
2024Evolution of Research Reporting Standards: Adapting to the Influence of Artificial Intelligence, Statistics Software, and Writing Tools17 cited
2011Five years of Trials8 cited