Differential Functioning by High and Low Impression Management Groups on a Big Five Applicant Screening Tool

Abstract

The degree to which applicant personality test faking constitutes a real world threat is a topic of considerable debate among industrial and organizational psychologists. Researchers have investigated the faking problem using a variety of methodologies, but have found inconclusive results. One method for studying faking involves the use of impression management scales, which are designed to detect individuals ’ use of intentional response distortion. However, most scales designed to detect applicant faking are too lengthy, too general, or otherwise impractical for use in applied settings. The current applied research involved the development, implementation, and validation of an eight-item impression management scale for use with the Fitability 5a, a Big Five personality test used for screening job applicants. Applicants ’ (n = 21,017) scores on the new scale were found to have satisfactory reliability and correlated as one might expect with the five personality scales. Applicants considered to be ―fakers‖ produced meaningful score differences on the agreeableness, conscientiousness, neuroticism, and openness scales, but not the extraversion scale.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 6 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.