Authority and Discretion: Tensions, Credible Delegation and Implications for New Organizational Forms

Abstract

We analyze a key problem in organization theory and design, namely the potential tension between authority (i.e., the power to make decisions which guide the decisions of another person) and the discretion of employees (i.e., the ability of an agent to control resources including his own human capital). The problem is rooted in the fact that in organizations, decisions rights are always loaned rather than owned; a hierarchical superior can always in principle overrule a hierarchical inferior. We provide an integrative treatment of the tensions that are involved in the interaction between authority and discretion, and the motivational problems that may result from this tension. We discuss how these problems may be checked by credible managerial commitments and other mechanisms. The framework is then applied to an analysis of new organizational forms, specifically internal hybrids. Thus, the framework adds to the understanding of the costs and benefits of alternative organizational forms. Acknowledgments We are grateful to Joyce Falkenberg, Kristian Kreiner, and Bertrand Quelin for excellent comments on an earlier version. Seminar audiences at Copenhagen Business School and Université Paris X (Nanterre) also provided useful inputs. All errors are the authors’ responsibility. Key words: Managerial intervention, credible delegation, new organizational forms, organizational economics.

Cite this work

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 9 citations exist upstream.

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.