SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21
16 references·4 citing·37 second hop
The effects of audience response systems on learning outcomes in health professions education. A BEME systematic review: BEME Guide No. 21 (2012)The effects of audience response systems …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (N…Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels (2009)Evaluating Training Programs …Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration (2008)Cochrane Handbook for Systema…A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms (2008)A review of literature report…Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips (2007)Clickers in the Large Classro…Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper (2007)Assessment of higher order co…Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature (2006)Classroom Response Systems: A…Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Measuring inconsistency in me…Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)Quantifying heterogeneity in …Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls (2002)Learning from Past and Presen…The development of diagnostic competence (1996)The development of diagnostic…Problem-based learning (1993)Problem-based learningDoes problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research (1993)Does problem-based learning w…Evaluating Training Programs (1956)Evaluating Training ProgramsTHE USE OF SOCRATIVE IN ESL CLASSROOMS: TOWARDS ACTIVE LEARNING (2017)THE USE OF SOCRATIVE IN ESL C…Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis (2016)Measuring the effect of ARS o…Research trends in student response systems: a literature review (2015)Research trends in student re…Creating formative feedback spaces in large lectures (2015)Creating formative feedback s…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)The Combination of Estimates from Different Experiments (1954)Funnel plots for detecting bias in meta-analysis (2001)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate healthcare interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The Human Problems of an Industrial Civilization (1934)Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses (1998)Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (2000)Examining the benefits and challenges of using audience response systems: A review of the literature (2009)Increased Structure and Active Learning Reduce the Achievement Gap in Introductory Biology (2011)The wear out effect of a game-based student response system (2014)The flawed four‐level evaluation model (1996)A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence (2004)The Science of Training and Development in Organizations (2012)Pedagogies of Engagement: Classroom-Based Practices (2005)Problem‐based learning: future challenges for educational practice and research (2005)When is PBL More Effective? A Meta-synthesis of Meta-analyses Comparing PBL to Conventional Classrooms (2009)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)A scoping review of scoping reviews: advancing the approach and enhancing the consistency (2014)Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range (2014)Systematic reviews in the social sciences: a practical guide (2006)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)A Global Classroom? Evaluating the Effectiveness of Global Virtual Collaboration as a Teaching Tool in Management Education (2013)Application of Structural Equation Modeling in Educational Research and Practice (2013)Learning factories for future oriented research and education in manufacturing (2017)Positive psychology interventions: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies (2013)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)Declaración PRISMA 2020: una guía actualizada para la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas (2021)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2003Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses63,086 cited
  • 2002Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis36,730 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions25,045 cited
  • 2014The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses17,633 cited
  • 2020Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions5,670 cited
  • 2008Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.0.1. The Cochrane Collaboration5,525 cited
  • 2009Evaluating Training Programs : The Four Levels4,738 cited
  • 1993Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of evaluative research1,455 cited
  • 2007Clickers in the Large Classroom: Current Research and Best-Practice Tips1,291 cited
  • 1956Evaluating Training Programs1,101 cited
  • 2006Classroom Response Systems: A Review of the Literature525 cited
  • 1993Problem-based learning430 cited
  • 2007Assessment of higher order cognitive skills in undergraduate education: modified essay or multiple choice questions? Research paper294 cited
  • 2002Learning from Past and Present: Electronic Response Systems in College Lecture Halls290 cited
  • 1996The development of diagnostic competence

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

231 cited
  • 2008A review of literature reports of clickers applicable to college chemistry classrooms220 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015Creating formative feedback spaces in large lectures75 cited
    • 2016Measuring the effect of ARS on academic performance: A global meta-analysis70 cited
    • 2015Research trends in student response systems: a literature review61 cited
    • 2017THE USE OF SOCRATIVE IN ESL CLASSROOMS: TOWARDS ACTIVE LEARNING30 cited