Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Going Back to the Street: Revisiting Lipsky’s Street-level Bureaucracy

16 references·6 citing·40 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1984The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action19,752 cited
1981Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services8,971 cited
2001Making Social Science Matter4,681 cited
1973On Being Sane in Insane Places2,136 cited
1984Policy analysis for the real world1,346 cited
2003Cops, Teachers, Counselors1,161 cited
2000State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion820 cited
2007Politicians, Managers, and Street-Level Bureaucrats: Influences on Policy Implementation586 cited
1987Pluralistic ignorance: When similarity is interpreted as dissimilarity.447 cited
2010Understanding Street‐Level Bureaucrats' Decision Making: Determining Eligibility in the Social Security Disability Program316 cited
2009The New Welfare Bureaucrats316 cited
2010The Bureaucrat and the Poor: Encounters in French Welfare Offices257 cited
2018Dilemmas of Social Reform232 cited
1978Policing: A View from the Street231 cited
2006Professionals, discretion and public sector reform in the UK: re‐visiting Lipsky176 cited
2010

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The new welfare bureaucrats: entanglements of race, class, and policy reform

160 cited

Cited by

2013‘I mean, obviously you're using your discretion’: Nurses Use of Discretion in Policy Implementation41 cited
2018Building Citizens’ Trust in Urban Infill: A Dynamic Approach11 cited
2015“Schooling” performance measurement: The politics of governing teacher conduct in Australia11 cited
2022Triadic Advocacy Work8 cited
2016L’analyse du non-recours : au-delà du modèle de la relation de service5 cited
2021Procedural environment of public engagement: an induced recall experiment of local government employees5 cited