References

• 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
• 1996Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary?17,580 cited
• 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
• 1998Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses?3,560 cited
• 1996Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement3,337 cited
• 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
• 2000Systematic Reviews in Health Care : Meta-Analysis in Context2,307 cited
• 1999The Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis1,981 cited
• 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
• 1995Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists1,306 cited
• 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
• 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
• 1994Invited Commentary: A Critical Look at Some Popular Meta-Analytic Methods508 cited
• 2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials