SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies
11 references·16 citing·43 second hop
Comparison of evidence on harms of medical interventions in randomized and nonrandomized studies (2006)Comparison of evidence on harms of medica…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Why Most Published Research F…Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research (2005)Contradicted and Initially St…Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement (2004)Better Reporting of Harms in …Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas. (2001)Completeness of safety report…Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies (2001)Comparison of Evidence of Tre…Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs (2000)Randomized, Controlled Trials…Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials (1998)Issues in Comparisons Between…Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials (1996)Large Trials vs Meta-analysis…Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study (2024)Healthcare outcomes assessed …Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms (2021)Harms in Systematic Reviews P…Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study (2019)Meta-analyses frequently pool…The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration. (2016)The Single-Case Reporting Gui…Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations (2015)Basic study design influences…Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research (2014)Inclusion of quasi-experiment…Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review (2013)Using Multiple Types of Studi…Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis (2013)Impact of STROBE Statement Pu…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies (2009)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results (2008)Reporting of adverse events i…Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies (2008)Evidence-Based Medicine, Syst…Declaración de la iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales (2008)Declaración de la iniciativa …Das Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE-) Statement (2008)Das Strengthening the Reporti…Das Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE-) Statement (2008)Das Strengthening the Reporti…AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program (2008)AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessin…Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Therapeutic Trials for Myocardial Infarction (1992)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)A random‐effects regression model for meta‐analysis (1995)Updating and Refining Prevalence Estimates of Disordered Gambling Behaviour in the United States and Canada (2001)Happy People Live Longer: Subjective Well-Being Contributes to Health and Longevity (2010)Evaluation of various estimators for standardized mean difference in meta‐analysis (2020)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Reporting results of cancer treatment (1981)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement (2007)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Reporting bias in medical research - a narrative review (2010)PRISMA harms checklist: improving harms reporting in systematic reviews (2016)Assessing the Risk of Bias of Individual Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Why Most Discovered True Associations Are Inflated (2008)Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling (2012)Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)How Quickly Do Systematic Reviews Go Out of Date? A Survival Analysis (2007)Conducting quantitative synthesis when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health Care Program (2011)Appraising the Quality of Medical Education Research Methods (2015)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)False-Positive Psychology (2011)Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience (2013)Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science (2015)Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies (2003)External validity of randomised controlled trials: “To whom do the results of this trial apply?” (2005)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)The New Statistics (2013)The ethics of algorithms: Mapping the debate (2016)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False10,471 cited
  • 2005Why Most Published Research Findings Are False4,702 cited
  • 2000Randomized, Controlled Trials, Observational Studies, and the Hierarchy of Research Designs3,561 cited
  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 2004Better Reporting of Harms in Randomized Trials: An Extension of the CONSORT Statement1,588 cited
  • 2005Contradicted and Initially Stronger Effects in Highly Cited Clinical Research1,465 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 2001Comparison of Evidence of Treatment Effects in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies919 cited
  • 2001Completeness of safety reporting in randomized trials: an evaluation of 7 medical areas.564 cited
  • 1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials336 cited
  • 1998Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials253 cited

Cited by

  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies234 cited
  • 2008Declaración de la iniciativa STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology): directrices para la comunicación de estudios observacionales225 cited
  • 2016

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

The Single-Case Reporting Guideline In BEhavioural Interventions (SCRIBE) 2016: Explanation and elaboration.
219 cited
  • 2008Das Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE-) Statement213 cited
  • 2008AHRQ Series Paper 4: Assessing harms when comparing medical interventions: AHRQ and the Effective Health-Care Program184 cited
  • 2008Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 6. Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Observational Studies167 cited
  • 2009Evidence-Based Medicine, Systematic Reviews, and Guidelines in Interventional Pain Management: Part 4: Observational Studies129 cited
  • 2015Basic study design influences the results of orthodontic clinical investigations108 cited
  • 2013Impact of STROBE Statement Publication on Quality of Observational Study Reporting: Interrupted Time Series versus Before-After Analysis101 cited
  • 2014Inclusion of quasi-experimental studies in systematic reviews of health systems research98 cited
  • 2008Das Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE-) Statement92 cited
  • 2013Using Multiple Types of Studies in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions – A Systematic Review89 cited
  • 2019Meta-analyses frequently pooled different study types together: a meta-epidemiological study68 cited
  • 2008Reporting of adverse events in systematic reviews can be improved: survey results64 cited
  • 2021Harms in Systematic Reviews Paper 1: An introduction to research on harms62 cited
  • 2024Healthcare outcomes assessed with observational study designs compared with those assessed in randomized trials: a meta-epidemiological study60 cited