SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related Interventions
16 references·7 citing·42 second hop
Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Randomized Trials for Mental Health-Related Interventions (2005)Comparison of Large Versus Smaller Random…Screening for Depression in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002)Screening for Depression in A…Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials (2002)Correlation of Quality Measur…The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement…Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials (2001)Assessing the quality of cont…Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (1999)Meta-Analysis, Decision Analy…A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit (1999)A Randomized, Controlled Tria…Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough (1998)Summing up evidence: one answ…Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials (1998)Issues in Comparisons Between…Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews (1997)Quantitative Synthesis in Sys…Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials (1997)Discrepancies between Meta-An…A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice (1997)A systematic review of the ef…Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials (1996)Large Trials vs Meta-analysis…Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (1995)Predictive ability of meta-an…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Meta-analysis in clinical tri…The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis (2023)The impact of blinding on tri…Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives (2017)Fact or fiction: reducing the…Umbrella Reviews, Overviews of Reviews, and Meta-epidemiologic Studies: Similarities and Differences (2016)Umbrella Reviews, Overviews o…The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: An Update on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (2011)The Psychopharmacology Algori…Development of a combined database for meta‐epidemiological research (2010)Development of a combined dat…Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power (2008)Publication bias was not a go…Bias in Meta-Analytic Estimates of the Absolute Efficacy of Psychotherapy (2007)Bias in Meta-Analytic Estimat…Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Operating Characteristics of a Rank Correlation Test for Publication Bias (1994)Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)The case of the misleading funnel plot (2006)The appropriateness of asymmetry tests for publication bias in meta-analyses: a large survey (2007)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)To IPD or not to IPD? (2002)Men and things, women and people: A meta-analysis of sex differences in interests. (2009)Meta-Analyst: software for meta-analysis of binary, continuous and diagnostic data (2009)Does quality of reports of randomised trials affect estimates of intervention efficacy reported in meta-analyses? (1998)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews (2003)Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews (2008)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis. (1986)Quantifying heterogeneity in a meta‐analysis (2002)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Conducting Meta-Analyses in R with the metafor Package (2010)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)A RATING SCALE FOR DEPRESSION (1960)An Inventory for Measuring Depression (1961)Collaborative Care Management of Late-Life Depression in the Primary Care Setting (2002)The 16-Item quick inventory of depressive symptomatology (QIDS), clinician rating (QIDS-C), and self-report (QIDS-SR): a psychometric evaluation in patients with chronic major depression (2003)An Ultra-Brief Screening Scale for Anxiety and Depression: The PHQ-4 (2009)Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (2013)Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)How important are comprehensive literature searches and the assessment of trial quality in systematic reviews? Empirical study (2003)Positive Psychological Well-Being and Mortality: A Quantitative Review of Prospective Observational Studies (2008)Trial sequential analysis reveals insufficient information size and potentially false positive results in many meta-analyses (2008)Is Sleep Duration Associated With Childhood Obesity? A Systematic Review and Meta‐analysis (2008)Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1 (2011)Intimate partner violence against adult women and its association with major depressive disorder, depressive symptoms and postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2012)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1986Meta-analysis in clinical trials39,515 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2001The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration3,828 cited
  • 2001Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials3,309 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 1997Quantitative Synthesis in Systematic Reviews2,515 cited
  • 1997Discrepancies between Meta-Analyses and Subsequent Large Randomized, Controlled Trials1,170 cited
  • 2002Screening for Depression in Adults: A Summary of the Evidence for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force1,086 cited
  • 1999Meta-Analysis, Decision Analysis, and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis925 cited
  • 1998Summing up evidence: one answer is not always enough655 cited
  • 2002Correlation of Quality Measures With Estimates of Treatment Effect in Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials473 cited
  • 1999A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of Remote, Intercessory Prayer on Outcomes in Patients Admitted to the Coronary Care Unit417 cited
  • 1996Large Trials vs Meta-analysis of Smaller Trials336 cited
  • 1997A systematic review of the effectiveness of promoting lifestyle change in general practice

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

331 cited
  • 1998Issues in Comparisons Between Meta-analyses and Large Trials253 cited
  • 1995Predictive ability of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials225 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2011The Psychopharmacology Algorithm Project at the Harvard South Shore Program: An Update on Posttraumatic Stress Disorder76 cited
    • 2023The impact of blinding on trial results: A systematic review and meta‐analysis35 cited
    • 2007Bias in Meta-Analytic Estimates of the Absolute Efficacy of Psychotherapy32 cited
    • 2016Umbrella Reviews, Overviews of Reviews, and Meta-epidemiologic Studies: Similarities and Differences29 cited
    • 2010Development of a combined database for meta‐epidemiological research25 cited
    • 2017Fact or fiction: reducing the proportion and impact of false positives22 cited
    • 2008Publication bias was not a good reason to discourage trials with low power17 cited