Women on Corporate Boards in I taly: The Role of Family Connections

Magda Bianco · Angela Ciavarella · Rossella Signoretti

153 citations0/0 files storedCorporate Governance An International Review

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Gender Diversity and Inequality Corporate Finance and Governance Gender Politics and Representation

Abstract

Abstract Manuscript Type Empirical Research Question/Issue This paper sets out to shed light on female representation on Italian corporate boards before the introduction of gender quota legislation in 2012, as well as on the relevance of family connections. We investigate the potential determinants of having boards with diverse representation and the correlation between female directorship and family connections, with a focus on governance measures. Research Findings Using data on all directors of Italian publicly traded companies from 2008 to 2010, we identify two different models. In the majority of gender‐diverse boards, at least one woman has a family connection to the controlling shareholder. Family‐affiliated women are more common in companies that are small, have a concentrated ownership, are in the consumer sector, and have a larger board. Conversely, non‐family‐affiliated women are more common on the boards of companies that are widely held, have younger and more educated boards, have a higher proportion of independent directors, and have a smaller number of interlocked directors. With reference to governance‐related outcomes, the number of board meetings appears to be negatively correlated to both the presence of family members and female directors. Additionally, women show lower attendance than men at board meetings. Theoretical/Academic Implications The paper provides support for theories on the differences between the governance of family‐owned and non‐family‐owned companies. Practitioner/Policy Implication The study offers insights to policymakers implementing gender quota legislation. Substantial effort should be devoted to ensuring that board diversity is associated with actual independence of board members.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 153 citations exist upstream.

References

1977Institutionalized Organizations: Formal Structure as Myth and Ceremony 1999Corporate Ownership Around the World 1979The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective 1985The Structure of Corporate Ownership: Causes and Consequences 2009Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance☆2003Founding‐Family Ownership and Firm Performance: Evidence from the S&P 500 2002The ultimate ownership of Western European corporations 2003Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value

Cited by

2017Women’s involvement in family firms: Progress and challenges for future research 2019Does board gender diversity influence voluntary disclosure of intellectual capital in initial public offering prospectuses? Evidence from China 2017Gender-diverse board and the relevance of voluntary CSR reporting 2020Does corporate governance matter in corporate social responsibility disclosure? Evidence from Italy in the “era of sustainability”2019Women on boards, firm risk and the profitability nexus: Does gender diversity moderate the risk and return relationship?

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.