SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How Do the Courts Create Popular Legitimacy? the Role of Establishing the Truth, Punishing Justly, And/or Acting through Just Procedures
0 references·8 citing·28 second hop
How Do the Courts Create Popular Legitimacy? the Role of Establishing the Truth, Punishing Justly, And/or Acting through Just Procedures (2014)How Do the Courts Create Popular Legitima…Fair governance with humans and machines. (2023)Fair governance with humans a…A research agenda for trust and distrust in a multilevel judicial system (2022)A research agenda for trust a…Procedural fairness: Between human rights law and social psychology (2021)Procedural fairness: Between …Perceptions of the Independence of Judges in Europe (2020)Perceptions of the Independen…Who errs? Algorithm aversion, the source of judicial error, and public support for self-help behaviors (2019)Who errs? Algorithm aversion,…Exploring the Overlap Between Procedural-Justice Principles and Emotion Regulation in the Courtroom (2019)Exploring the Overlap Between…Procedural Justice and Risk-Assessment Algorithms (2018)Procedural Justice and Risk-A…Fairness at Trial: The Impact of Procedural Justice and Other Experiential Factors on Criminal Defendants’ Perceptions of Court Legitimacy in Poland (2018)Fairness at Trial: The Impact…Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err (2014)European Union Regulations on Algorithmic Decision Making and a “Right to Explanation” (2017)Algorithm appreciation: People prefer algorithmic to human judgment (2019)Educating Computer Science Students about Algorithmic Fairness, Accountability, Transparency and Ethics (2021)Does Artificial Intelligence Help or Hurt Gender Diversity? Evidence from Two Field Experiments on Recruitment in Tech (2024)Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis (1975)The weirdest people in the world? (2010)The New Jim Crow: Mass Incarceration in the Age of Colorblindness (2011)(In)justice in academia: procedural fairness, students’ academic identification, and perceived legitimacy of university authorities (2022)The Role of Procedural Justice and Legitimacy in Shaping Public Support for Policing (2003)Why People Obey the Law (2006)Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power (2009)Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy (2017)When Algorithms Err : Differential Impact of Early vs. Late Errors on Users’ Reliance on Algorithms (2022)Ethics and Trustworthiness of AI for Predicting the Risk of Recidivism: A Systematic Literature Review (2023)Perceived opacity leads to algorithm aversion in the workplace (2024)What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Fairness in Social Relationships. (1976)Relationship between organizational justice and organizational citizenship behaviors: Do fairness perceptions influence employee citizenship? (1991)On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. (2001)Trust in Organizations: Frontiers of Theory and Research (1996)Not So Different After All: A Cross-Discipline View Of Trust (1998)TRUST AND DISTRUST IN ORGANIZATIONS: Emerging Perspectives, Enduring Questions (1999)Global Business Regulation (2001)Trust in the Law: Encouraging Public Cooperation with the Police and Courts (2002)The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust (2008)The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice (1988)Enabling media production with AIGC and its ethical considerations (2024)AI: Friend or foe of fairness perceptions of the tax administration? A survey experiment on citizens' procedural fairness perceptions (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Who errs? Algorithm aversion, the source of judicial error, and public support for self-help behaviors26 cited
  • 2018Procedural Justice and Risk-Assessment Algorithms24 cited
  • 2018Fairness at Trial: The Impact of Procedural Justice and Other Experiential Factors on Criminal Defendants’ Perceptions of Court Legitimacy in Poland22 cited
  • 2022A research agenda for trust and distrust in a multilevel judicial system19 cited
  • 2023Fair governance with humans and machines.19 cited
  • 2020Perceptions of the Independence of Judges in Europe13 cited
  • 2021Procedural fairness: Between human rights law and social psychology11 cited
  • 2019Exploring the Overlap Between Procedural-Justice Principles and Emotion Regulation in the Courtroom9 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work