SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Adequate responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation
16 references·4 citing·32 second hop
Adequate responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation (2012)Adequate responsiveness to scope in conti…Incentive and informational properties of preference questions (2007)Incentive and informational p…Handbook on Contingent Valuation (2006)Handbook on Contingent Valuat…Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions (2005)Computational Methods for Mea…Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation (2003)Identifying the warm glow eff…Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values (2003)Aggregating the benefits of e…Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a “Scope” Test? A Meta-analysis (1996)Do Contingent Valuation Estim…Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation (1994)Valuing the Environment Throu…How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation (1994)How People Respond to Conting…Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method (1994)Determinants of stated willin…Contingent Valuation and Social Choice (1994)Contingent Valuation and Soci…Report of NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation (1993)Report of NOAA Panel on Conti…Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment (1993)Contingent Valuation: A Criti…Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction (1992)Valuing public goods: The pur…Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation (1991)Statistical Efficiency of Dou…Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method (1987)Valuing Environmental Goods: …Valuing Option, Existence, and Bequest Demands for Wilderness (1984)Valuing Option, Existence, an…Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter? (2017)Scope Effects in Contingent V…Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods (2017)Contingent Valuation of Envir…Plausible responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation (2016)Plausible responsiveness to s…Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico: Current status and trends (2016)Economic valuation of ecosyst…Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behavior (1972)Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method (1989)Economic Analysis of Social Interactions (2000)The contingent valuation method: a review (2003)Experimental methods: Between-subject and within-subject design (2011)Reliability and Validity Assessment (2011)Measuring Values of Extramarket Goods: Are Indirect Measures Biased? (1979)Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Responses (1984)THE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF DISCRETE-RESPONSE CV DATA (1996)Economic Preferences or Attitude Expressions?: An Analysis of Dollar Responses to Public Issues (1999)Chapter 17 Contingent Valuation (2005)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1974)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior (1980)The Cost of Price Incentives: An Empirical Analysis of Motivation Crowding-Out (1997)On Approximating the Statistical Properties of Elasticities (1986)Welfare Evaluations in Contingent Valuation Experiments with Discrete Response Data: Reply (1989)Willingness-to-pay for renewable energy: Primary and discretionary choice of British households' for micro-generation technologies (2009)Hypothetical bias, choice experiments and willingness to pay (2010)COUNTERSPECULATION, AUCTIONS, AND COMPETITIVE SEALED TENDERS (1961)Judgment under Uncertainty (1982)Measuring Consumers' Willingness to Pay at the Point of Purchase (2002)Discrete Choice Experiments Are Not Conjoint Analysis (2010)WHAT'S TO KNOW ABOUT HYPOTHETICAL BIAS IN STATED PREFERENCE VALUATION STUDIES? (2011)Developing a Questionnaire (2015)Contingent Valuation: Is Some Number Better than No Number? (1994)ERC: A Theory of Equity, Reciprocity, and Competition (2000)Incentives and Prosocial Behavior (2006)Contemporary Guidance for Stated Preference Studies (2017)What Experimental Protocol Influence Disparities Between Actual and Hypothetical Stated Values? (2001)A Review of WTA/WTP Studies (2002)Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence (2001)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1993Report of NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation1,946 cited
  • 1992Valuing public goods: The purchase of moral satisfaction1,942 cited
  • 1991Statistical Efficiency of Double‐Bounded Dichotomous Choice Contingent Valuation1,823 cited
  • 1994Valuing the Environment Through Contingent Valuation1,643 cited
  • 2007Incentive and informational properties of preference questions1,367 cited
  • 1993Contingent Valuation: A Critical Assessment1,115 cited
  • 1987Valuing Environmental Goods: An Assessment of the Contingent Valuation Method1,054 cited
  • 2005Computational Methods for Measuring the Difference of Empirical Distributions609 cited
  • 1994How People Respond to Contingent Valuation Questions: A Verbal Protocol Analysis of Willingness to Pay for an Environmental Regulation474 cited
  • 1994Contingent Valuation and Social Choice473 cited
  • 1984Valuing Option, Existence, and Bequest Demands for Wilderness394 cited
  • 1994Determinants of stated willingness to pay for public goods: A study in the headline method359 cited
  • 2003Aggregating the benefits of environmental improvements: distance-decay functions for use and non-use values295 cited
  • 2006Handbook on Contingent Valuation272 cited
  • 2003

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Identifying the warm glow effect in contingent valuation
249 cited
  • 1996Do Contingent Valuation Estimates Pass a “Scope” Test? A Meta-analysis247 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2016Economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico: Current status and trends78 cited
    • 2017Contingent Valuation of Environmental Goods66 cited
    • 2017Scope Effects in Contingent Valuation: Does the Assumed Statistical Distribution of WTP Matter?62 cited
    • 2016Plausible responsiveness to scope in contingent valuation56 cited