SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
How to critically appraise an article
16 references·15 citing·34 second hop
How to critically appraise an article (2009)How to critically appraise an articleA Dictionary of Epidemiology (2008)A Dictionary of EpidemiologyStrengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)Strengthening the reporting o…Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews (2007)Development of AMSTAR: a meas…The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (2004)The Cochrane Database of Syst…The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration (2003)The STARD statement for repor…Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study (2003)Assessment of the accuracy of…Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. (2002)Systems to rate the strength …The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revise…Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research (2000)Qualitative research in healt…Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting (2000)Meta-analysis of Observationa…Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (2000)Improving the quality of repo…How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature (2000)How to review the evidence: s…Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials (1995)Empirical evidence of bias. D…Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Empirical Evidence of BiasPublication bias in clinical research (1991)Publication bias in clinical …Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical Research (1989)Publication Bias and Dissemin…Tools for assessing quality of studies investigating health interventions using real-world data: a literature review and content analysis (2024)Tools for assessing quality o…Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy among African American and Black Individuals in the United States of America: A Systematic Literature Review (2024)Determinants of Vaccine Hesit…Study design quality of research on dogs published in peer‐reviewed journals (2022)Study design quality of resea…Evaluative Frameworks and Scientific Knowledge for Undergraduate STEM Students: An Illustrative Case Study Perspective (2020)Evaluative Frameworks and Sci…Critical appraisal: The key to unlocking information literacy in the STEM disciplines (2020)Critical appraisal: The key t…Coastal community resilience frameworks for disaster risk management (2020)Coastal community resilience …District‐level impacts of health system decentralization in Indonesia: A systematic review (2019)District‐level impacts of hea…How to critically appraise a paper (2018)How to critically appraise a …Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) for assessing multiple types of evidence (2017)Critical Appraisal Toolkit (C…What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs (2015)What do people really think o…A conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method (2015)A conceptual breakdown struct…Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review (2014)Gendered specialities during …Dance for People With Parkinson Disease: What Is the Evidence Telling Us? (2014)Dance for People With Parkins…Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective (2013)Reporting a Population Pharma…Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies (2013)Critical Appraisal of Mixed M…Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use (1989)Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? (1996)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Improving the Reporting Quality of Nonrandomized Evaluations of Behavioral and Public Health Interventions: The TREND Statement (2004)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results. (1979)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups (2007)Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses (2010)AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both (2017)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Summarizing systematic reviews (2015)Development of a critical appraisal tool to assess the quality of cross-sectional studies (AXIS) (2016)Systematic Reviews: Rationale for systematic reviews (1994)Rebooting Psychotherapy Research and Practice to Reduce the Burden of Mental Illness (2011)The Efficacy of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy: A Review of Meta-analyses (2012)Theories of behaviour and behaviour change across the social and behavioural sciences: a scoping review (2014)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)Towards a common definition of global health (2009)The Growth of Incarceration in the United States (2014)Supply chain sustainability: A risk management approach (2015)Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: a case of the tail wagging the dog? (2001)The case study approach (2011)Systematic methodological review: developing a framework for a qualitative semi‐structured interview guide (2016)A Nonparametric "Trim and Fill" Method of Accounting for Publication Bias in Meta-Analysis (2000)A meta-analytic test of intergroup contact theory. (2006)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2000Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology A Proposal for Reporting20,612 cited
  • 2007Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies10,709 cited
  • 1995Empirical Evidence of Bias5,632 cited
  • 1995Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials5,560 cited
  • 2007Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews4,376 cited
  • 2000Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research3,736 cited
  • 1991Publication bias in clinical research3,110 cited
  • 2001The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials2,754 cited
  • 2008A Dictionary of Epidemiology2,175 cited
  • 2004The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews1,512 cited
  • 2003The STARD statement for reporting studies of diagnostic accuracy: explanation and elaboration1,214 cited
  • 2002Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence.880 cited
  • 1989Publication Bias and Dissemination of Clinical Research441 cited
  • 2000Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

416 cited
  • 2003Assessment of the accuracy of diagnostic tests: the cross-sectional study312 cited
  • 2000How to review the evidence: systematic identification and review of the scientific literature268 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2015What do people really think of generic medicines? A systematic review and critical appraisal of literature on stakeholder perceptions of generic drugs191 cited
    • 2013Critical Appraisal of Mixed Methods Studies169 cited
    • 2014Dance for People With Parkinson Disease: What Is the Evidence Telling Us?168 cited
    • 2020Coastal community resilience frameworks for disaster risk management126 cited
    • 2014Gendered specialities during medical education: a literature review72 cited
    • 2013Reporting a Population Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Study: A Journal’s Perspective55 cited
    • 2019District‐level impacts of health system decentralization in Indonesia: A systematic review44 cited
    • 2024Determinants of Vaccine Hesitancy among African American and Black Individuals in the United States of America: A Systematic Literature Review34 cited
    • 2015A conceptual breakdown structure for knowledge management benefits using meta-synthesis method32 cited
    • 2017Critical Appraisal Toolkit (CAT) for assessing multiple types of evidence23 cited
    • 2020Critical appraisal: The key to unlocking information literacy in the STEM disciplines17 cited
    • 2024Tools for assessing quality of studies investigating health interventions using real-world data: a literature review and content analysis14 cited
    • 2020Evaluative Frameworks and Scientific Knowledge for Undergraduate STEM Students: An Illustrative Case Study Perspective13 cited
    • 2022Study design quality of research on dogs published in peer‐reviewed journals7 cited
    • 2018How to critically appraise a paper7 cited