Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Co‐Production of Public Services in Australia: The Roles of Government Organisations and Co‐Producers

16 references·16 citing·34 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

1996Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development2,656 cited
1996Creating public value: strategic management in government2,551 cited
2007Beyond Engagement and Participation: User and Community Coproduction of Public Services1,978 cited
1991Managerialism and the public services: the Anglo-American experience918 cited
2006Co-production, the third sector and the delivery of public services667 cited
2012Co-production: The State of the Art in Research and the Future Agenda584 cited
2013New Public Governance, the Third Sector, and Co-Production559 cited
2004Institutionalised Co-production: Unorthodox Public Service Delivery in Challenging Environments496 cited
2009Engaging Public Sector Clients488 cited
2007Creating Citizen-Consumers: Changing Publics & Changing Public Services410 cited
2008Realising the Potential of Co-production: Negotiating Improvements in Public Services330 cited
2002Why Do Public-Sector Clients Coproduce?324 cited
2014Activating Citizens to Participate in Collective Co-Production of Public Services308 cited
2013Correlates of Co-production: Evidence From a Five-Nation Survey of Citizens266 cited
2009TOWARDS A PARADIGM OF DEMOCRATIC PARTICIPATION: CITIZEN PARTICIPATION AND CO‐PRODUCTION OF PERSONAL SOCIAL SERVICES IN SWEDEN

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

263 cited

2007Pieces of a Puzzle: Linking Government Performance, Citizen Satisfaction, and Trust235 cited

Cited by

2018Realizing public values: enhancement or obstruction? Exploring value tensions and coping strategies in the co-production of social care96 cited
2018ICTs and value creation in public sector: Manufacturing logic vs service logic87 cited
2018Financial Rewards Do Not Stimulate Coproduction: Evidence from Two Experiments79 cited
2019Assessing the impact of co-production on pathways to outcomes in public services: the case of policing and criminal justice78 cited
2021Neighbourhood governance during the COVID-19 lockdown in Hangzhou: coproduction based on digital technologies56 cited
2021Travelling along the public service co-production road: a bibliometric analysis and interpretive review52 cited
2021Organizational maturity for co-creation: Towards a multi-attribute decision support model for public organizations50 cited
2019Leading Digital Technologies for Coproduction: the Case of “Visit Once” Administrative Service Reform in Zhejiang Province, China50 cited
2023Actor roles in co‐production—Introducing intermediaries: Findings from a systematic literature review48 cited
2020Social‐Psychological Context Moderates Incentives to Co‐produce: Evidence from a Large‐Scale Survey Experiment on Park Upkeep in an Urban Setting44 cited
2020Does Co-Production Lead to the Creation of Public Value? Balancing the Dimensions of Public Value Creation in Urban Mobility Planning40 cited
2016IMPROVEMENT AND PUBLIC SERVICE RELATIONSHIPS: CULTURAL THEORY AND INSTITUTIONAL WORK37 cited
2019Next generation engagement: Setting a research agenda for community engagement in Australia's infrastructure sector35 cited
2021A Comparative Analysis of Co-Production in Public Services32 cited
2020Public value budgeting: propositions for the future of budgeting28 cited
2018Community engagement in Australian local governments: a closer look and strategic implications26 cited