SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
What is the Probability that This Blood Came from That Person? A Meaningful Question?
0 references·15 citing·35 second hop
What is the Probability that This Blood Came from That Person? A Meaningful Question? (1983)What is the Probability that This Blood C…A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer (2018)A response to “Likelihood rat…Likelihood Ratios for categorical evidence; Comparison of LR models applied to gunshot residue data (2017)Likelihood Ratios for categor…Case Assessment and Interpretation (2009)Case Assessment and Interpret…An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence (2006)An extended likelihood ratio …Why the effect of prior odds should accompany the likelihood ratio when reporting DNA evidence (2004)Why the effect of prior odds …Comment on: Why the effect of prior odds should accompany the likelihood ratio when reporting DNA evidence (2004)Comment on: Why the effect of…Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Probabilistic reasoning in th…Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Probabilistic reasoning in th…Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fibre transfer evidence (1997)Bayesian framework for the ev…Assessing prior probabilities considering geography (1994)Assessing prior probabilities…Subjective Probability, Decision Analysis and their Legal Consequences (1991)Subjective Probability, Decis…Some aspects of the Bayesian approach to evidence evaluation (1989)Some aspects of the Bayesian …On meaningful questions: a two-trace transfer problem (1987)On meaningful questions: a tw…Evaluation of Associative Evidence: Choosing the Relevant Question (1984)Evaluation of Associative Evi…A Quantitative Theory for Interpreting Transfer Evidence in Criminal Cases (1984)A Quantitative Theory for Int…The Evidential Value of the Comparison of Paint Flakes from Sources other than Vehicles (1968)Evaluation of Associative Physical Evidence (1986)An Evaluation of the Significance of Transfers of Debris: Criteria for Association and Exclusion (1999)The strange persistence of (source) “identification” claims in forensic literature through descriptivism, diagnosticism and machinism (2022)Judgement under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1983)A Bayesian Approach to the Problem of Interpreting Glass Evidence in Forensic Science Casework (1986)The interpretation of glass evidence. A practical approach (1990)The Statistical Interpretation of Forensic Glass Evidence (2003)The Use Of Statistics In Forensic Science (1991)Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)An attempt to assess the relevance of textile fibres recovered from car seats (1997)A study on contactless airborne transfer of textile fibres between different garments in small compact semi-enclosed spaces (2020)The use of statistics in forensic science (1987)More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions (2000)Avoiding probabilistic reasoning fallacies in legal practice using Bayesian networks (2011)The Forensic Disciplines: Some Areas of Actual or Potential Application (2011)Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors (2013)A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (2004)Latent print examination and human factors : (2012)Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach (2015)Forensic analysis of condom traces: Chemical considerations and review of the literature (2020)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. (1984)Interpretation of Evidence, and Sample Size Determination (2000)Understanding forensic science opinions (2015)Trial by Mathematics: Precision and Ritual in the Legal Process (1971)The Probable and The Provable (1977)Evidence, Proof and Probability. (1979)A formal approach to qualifying and quantifying the ‘goodness’ of forensic identification decisions (2018)Establishing the evidential value of a small quantity of material found at a crime scene (1993)The Empirical Study of the Persuasive Effects of Evidence The Status After Fifty Years of Research (1988)Evaluation and presentation of forensic DNA evidence in European laboratories (2002)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 1984A Quantitative Theory for Interpreting Transfer Evidence in Criminal Cases61 cited
  • 1987On meaningful questions: a two-trace transfer problem58 cited
  • 1989Some aspects of the Bayesian approach to evidence evaluation51 cited
  • 2006An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence43 cited
  • 1997Bayesian framework for the evaluation of fibre transfer evidence40 cited
  • 2004Why the effect of prior odds should accompany the likelihood ratio when reporting DNA evidence39 cited
  • 1998Probabilistic reasoning in the law34 cited
  • 1991Subjective Probability, Decision Analysis and their Legal Consequences31 cited
  • 1984Evaluation of Associative Evidence: Choosing the Relevant Question30 cited
  • 1998Probabilistic reasoning in the law25 cited
  • 2018A response to “Likelihood ratio as weight of evidence: A closer look” by Lund and Iyer20 cited
  • 2009Case Assessment and Interpretation17 cited
  • 1994Assessing prior probabilities considering geography13 cited
  • 2017Likelihood Ratios for categorical evidence; Comparison of LR models applied to gunshot residue data12 cited
  • 2004

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Comment on: Why the effect of prior odds should accompany the likelihood ratio when reporting DNA evidence
11 cited