SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Get in the spirit with SPIRIT 2013: protocol content guideline for clinical trials
14 references·2 citing·40 second hop
Get in the spirit with SPIRIT 2013: protocol content guideline for clinical trials (2013)Get in the spirit with SPIRIT 2013: proto…SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols (2013)SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for…SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defini…SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials (2013)SPIRIT 2013 explanation and e…Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols (2012)Published methodological qual…Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review (2012)Guidelines for randomized cli…Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists (2011)Frequency and reasons for out…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updat…Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols (2008)Discrepancies in sample size …The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporti…Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study (2005)Comparison of descriptions of…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative (2003)Towards Complete and Accurate…Structured success: Study protocols and preregistration in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation (2024)Structured success: Study pro…How to use the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) in orthodontic research (2022)How to use the Standard Proto…Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials (1996)Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement (1996)The CONSORT Statement: Revised Recommendations for Improving the Quality of Reports of Parallel-Group Randomized Trials (2001)Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews (2005)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Transparent reporting of a multivariable prediction model for individual prognosis or diagnosis (TRIPOD): The TRIPOD statement (2015)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)Rules of evidence for cancer molecular-marker discovery and validation (2004)Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research (2005)Measurement in Medicine: A Practical Guide (2011)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (2009)Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement. (2009)Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide (2014)Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (2014)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)CONSORT 2010 Explanation and Elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Evidence for the Selective Reporting of Analyses and Discrepancies in Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review of Cohort Studies of Clinical Trials (2014)Selective reporting bias of harm outcomes within studies: findings from a cohort of systematic reviews (2014)SPIRIT 2013 Statement: defining standard protocol items for clinical trials. (2015)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2020)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)CONSORT 2010 Statement: Updated Guidelines for Reporting Parallel Group Randomized Trials (2010)Reporting of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2013)Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement (2015)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): Explanation and Elaboration (2007)Reducing waste from incomplete or unusable reports of biomedical research (2014)Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies: what are they and which is better? (2020)Prevalence of mental health problems during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2020)Internet-based cognitive behavioural therapy for young people with suicide-related behaviour (Reframe-IT): a randomised controlled trial (2017)Multiple outcomes and analyses in clinical trials create challenges for interpretation and research synthesis (2017)Reporting guidelines for clinical trials evaluating artificial intelligence interventions are needed (2019)Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): Explanation and Elaboration (2015)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2007The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies21,132 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials13,365 cited
  • 2010CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials9,314 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 Statement: Defining Standard Protocol Items for Clinical Trials7,356 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials6,239 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative3,215 cited
  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 2003Towards Complete and Accurate Reporting of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy: The STARD Initiative703 cited
  • 2013SPIRIT 2013: new guidance for content of clinical trial protocols306 cited
  • 2011Frequency and reasons for outcome reporting bias in clinical trials: interviews with trialists220 cited
  • 2005Comparison of descriptions of allocation concealment in trial protocols and the published reports: cohort study209 cited
  • 2008Discrepancies in sample size calculations and data analyses reported in randomised trials: comparison of publications with protocols201 cited
  • 2012Published methodological quality of randomized controlled trials does not reflect the actual quality assessed in protocols

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

101 cited
  • 2012Guidelines for randomized clinical trial protocol content: a systematic review81 cited
  • Cited by

    • 2022How to use the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials (SPIRIT) in orthodontic research17 cited
    • 2024Structured success: Study protocols and preregistration in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation11 cited