Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Dissociating Indifferent, Directional, and Extreme Responding in Personality Data: Applying the Three‐Process Model to Self‐ and Observer Reports

16 references·13 citing·47 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1969Statistical Theories of Mental Test Scores8,023 cited
1991Measurement and Control of Response Bias3,704 cited
2007Empirical, Theoretical, and Practical Advantages of the HEXACO Model of Personality Structure2,171 cited
1968Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee's ability1,998 cited
2004The Concept of Validity.1,730 cited
2001Response Styles in Marketing Research: A Cross-National Investigation1,261 cited
2002What's wrong with cross-cultural comparisons of subjective Likert scales?: The reference-group effect.1,081 cited
2006Response Styles in Cross-national Survey Research742 cited
2005The Relation Between Culture and Response Styles661 cited
2012Response Styles in Survey Research: A Literature Review of Antecedents, Consequences, and Remedies464 cited
2012Sex, Power, and Money: Prediction from the Dark Triad and Honesty–Humility446 cited
2008The HEXACO Personality Factors in the Indigenous Personality Lexicons of English and 11 Other Languages435 cited
2008The prediction of Honesty–Humility-related criteria by the HEXACO and Five-Factor Models of personality433 cited
1984Yea-Saying, Nay-Saying, and Going to Extremes: Black-White Differences in Response Styles371 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

1992

Measuring Extreme Response Style

368 cited

2006Further assessment of the HEXACO Personality Inventory: Two new facet scales and an observer report form.334 cited

Cited by

2016Age trends in HEXACO-PI-R self-reports130 cited
2021On the Comparability of Basic Personality Models: Meta-Analytic Correspondence, Scope, and Orthogonality of the Big Five and HEXACO Dimensions103 cited
2018The predictive power of people’s intraindividual variability across situations: Implementing whole trait theory in assessment.93 cited
2018How Well Do Big Five Measures Capture HEXACO Scale Variance?89 cited
2016Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory66 cited
2019IRT ree models with ordinal and multidimensional decision nodes for response styles and trait‐based rating responses55 cited
2018A New Model for Acquiescence at the Interface of Psychometrics and Cognitive Psychology50 cited
2016Using Personality Item Characteristics to Predict Single–Item Internal Reliability, Retest Reliability, and Self–Other Agreement47 cited
2019Item Response Tree Models to Investigate Acquiescence and Extreme Response Styles in Likert-Type Rating Scales40 cited
2020The Science and Practice of Item Response Theory in Organizations39 cited
2020Caught in the Act: Predicting Cheating in Unproctored Knowledge Assessment35 cited
2021Faking Detection Improved: Adopting a Likert Item Response Process Tree Model30 cited
2020Different approaches to modeling response styles in divide-by-total item response theory models (part 2): Applications and novel extensions.28 cited