Negative affectivity and workplace deviance: the moderating role of ethical climate

Chien-Cheng Chen · Mavis Yi-Ching Chen · Ying-Chun Liu

69 citations0/0 files storedThe International Journal of Human Resource Management

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Ethics in Business and Education Cyberloafing and Workplace Behavior

Abstract

This study investigates (1) the relationship between employees’ trait of negative affectivity (NA) and workplace deviance and (2) the moderating role of ethical climate in the above relationship. Data was collected from 310 employees in 40 Taiwanese companies, and hierarchical linear modeling was used to test the hypotheses. Results show that NA was positively related to workplace deviance. In addition, the rules climate weakened the relationship between NA and workplace deviance, and both the instrumental climate and the caring climate strengthened the relationship between NA and workplace deviance. Managerial implications and future research directions are also discussed.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 69 citations exist upstream.

References

2003Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies.1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1988Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales.1978Social Learning Theory.1991Emotion And Adaptation 2001On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure.1984Negative affectivity: The disposition to experience aversive emotional states.1968Personality and Assessment

Cited by

2017A Systematic Review on the Deviant Workplace Behavior 2014In the Eye of the beholder: a multi-stakeholder perspective of organizational citizenship and counterproductive work behaviors 2017Conceptual Framework on Workplace Deviance Behaviour: A Review 2020Opportunity, job pressure and deviant workplace behaviour: does neutralisation mediate the relationship? A study of faculty members in public universities in Nigeria 2017Proservice or antiservice employee behaviors: A multilevel ethics perspective

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.