Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Introducing a forced-choice recognition task to the California Verbal Learning Test – Children’s Version

16 references·16 citing·31 second hopsampled

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop· second hop is a sample of the most-cited connections

References

2009American Academy of Clinical Neuropsychology Consensus Conference Statement on the Neuropsychological Assessment of Effort, Response Bias, and Malingering869 cited
2005Symptom validity assessment: Practice issues and medical necessityNAN Policy & Planning Committee836 cited
2000California verbal learning test-second edition770 cited
1994Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample.641 cited
1994Validation of malingered amnesia measures with a large clinical sample.570 cited
2003Detection of Malingering Using Atypical Performance Patterns on Standard Neuropsychological Tests567 cited
2003Neuropsychological Evaluation of the Child400 cited
2014California Verbal Learning Test, Children's Version319 cited
2008The Need For Continuous and Comprehensive Sampling of Effort/Response Bias During Neuropsychological Examinations289 cited
2004Neuropsychological evaluation of the child216 cited
2012Forensic Neuropsychology: A Scientific Approach205 cited
1995The California Verbal Learning Test in the detection of incomplete effort in neuropsychological evaluation.165 cited
2003Developmental Neuropsychological Assessment: The Systemic Approach125 cited
1984Neuropsychological approaches to children: Towards a developmental neuropsychology

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

117 cited

2003Using the TOMM for Evaluating Children’s Effort to Perform Optimally on Neuropsychological Measures101 cited

2006Detection of inadequate effort on the California Verbal Learning Test-Second edition: Forced choice recognition and critical item analysis100 cited

Cited by

2018The D-KEFS Trails as performance validity tests.53 cited
2016Elevations on select Conners’ CPT-II scales indicate noncredible responding in adults with traumatic brain injury51 cited
2018The Grooved Pegboard Test as a Validity Indicator—a Study on Psychogenic Interference as a Confound in Performance Validity Research46 cited
2017Utility of critical items within the Recognition Memory Test and Word Choice Test43 cited
2020Introducing a forced choice recognition trial to the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised43 cited
2018The Boston Naming Test as a Measure of Performance Validity39 cited
2019Stronger Together: The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale—Fourth Edition as a Multivariate Performance Validity Test in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury38 cited
2021They are not destined to fail: a systematic examination of scores on embedded performance validity indicators in patients with intellectual disability37 cited
2022Take Their Word for It: The Inventory of Problems Provides Valuable Information on Both Symptom and Performance Validity33 cited
2021This will only take a minute: Time cutoffs are superior to accuracy cutoffs on the forced choice recognition trial of the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test – Revised30 cited
2019Are we documenting performance validity testing in pediatric neuropsychological assessments? A brief report27 cited
2018Performance and Symptom Validity Testing in Pediatric Assessment: A Review of the Literature27 cited
2021Validation of grooved pegboard cutoffs as an additional embedded measure of performance validity22 cited
2020A review of performance and symptom validity testing with pediatric populations21 cited
2021Flipping the Script: Measuring Both Performance Validity and Cognitive Ability with the Forced Choice Recognition Trial of the RCFT21 cited
2018One-minute PVT: Further evidence for the utility of the California Verbal Learning Test—Children’s Version forced choice recognition trial.19 cited