SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect
1 references·2 citing·13 second hop
Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean It's Perfect (2015)Just Because It's Published Doesn't Mean …Peer Review Should Continue After Publication (2010)Peer Review Should Continue A…Imperfect but important: a fellow’s perspective on journal peer review (2019)Imperfect but important: a fe…Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process (2017)Resident Research Tips: Survi…The scandal of poor medical research (1994)Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals (1998)Poor-quality medical research: what can journals do? (2002)Science 3.0: Corrections to the Science 2.0 paradigm (2013)Letter to Editor, a scientific forum for discussion (2016)Post-publication peer review in biomedical journals: overcoming obstacles and disincentives to knowledge sharing (2018)Experiential Learning : Experience as the Source of Learning and Development (1983)Nepotism and sexism in peer-review (1997)Peer Review: A Flawed Process at the Heart of Science and Journals (2006)Guarding the Guardians: A Conference on Editorial Peer Review (1986)A Systematic Guide to Reviewing a Manuscript (2005)Making the First Cut: An Analysis of Academic Medicine Editors’ Reasons for Not Sending Manuscripts Out for External Peer Review (2017)Scientists’ perception of pilot study quality was influenced by statistical significance and study design (2023)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2010Peer Review Should Continue After Publication23 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Resident Research Tips: Surviving and Thriving Within the Peer Review Process8 cited
  • 2019Imperfect but important: a fellow’s perspective on journal peer review8 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work