SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals
16 references·0 citing·34 second hop
Party Capability and the US Courts of Appeals (2016)Party Capability and the US Courts of App…The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court (2006)The Influence of Oral Argumen…Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making (2004)Signals from the Tenth Justic…Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals (2002)Making Law in the United Stat…Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas (2001)Picking Federal Judges: A Not…Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting (2000)Congress: A Political-Economi…Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals (1998)Judicial Partisanship and Obe…Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success (1995)Repeat Players in the Supreme…The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions (1994)The Hierarchy of Justice: Tes…Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals (1992)Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs…Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court (1992)Ideology, Status, and The Dif…Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970 (1987)Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead…Reliability and Validity Assessment (1979)Reliability and Validity Asse…Factor Analysis (1978)Factor AnalysisVoting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited (1975)Voting Behavior on the United…Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change (1974)Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahea…Politics : Who Gets What, When, How (1937)Politics : Who Gets What, Whe…The New Economics of Organization (1984)Ideological Values and the Votes of U.S. Supreme Court Justices (1989)The Supreme Court and the Attitudinal Model (1993)Separation-of-Powers Games in the Positive Theory of Congress and Courts (1997)Principal-Agent Models: An Expansion? (1998)Accountability and Coercion: Is Justice Blind When It Runs for Office? (2004)Personal Attribute Models of the Voting Behavior of U.S. Supreme Court Justices: Liberalism in Civil Liberties and Economics Decisions, 1946–1978 (1981)Amicus Curiae and the Role of Information at the Supreme Court (1997)The Interplay of Preferences, Case Facts, Context, and Rules in the Politics of Judicial Choice (1997)A theory of justice original editionThe Logic of Collective Action (1965)Exit, Voice and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. (1970)The Social Control of Impersonal Trust (1987)Legal Ambiguity and Symbolic Structures: Organizational Mediation of Civil Rights Law (1992)The New Comparative Economics (2003)Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making (2002)Institutional Dynamics on the U.S. Court of Appeals: Minority Representation Under Panel Decision Making (2004)When Organizations Rule: Judicial Deference to Institutionalized Employment Structures (2011)Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration? (2002)Party Policy in Modern Democracies (2006)Polarized America: the dance of ideology and unequal riches (2007)The Judicial Common Space (2007)POLITICS AND INSTITUTIONALISM: Explaining Durability and Change (1999)The City as a Growth Machine: Toward a Political Economy of Place (2005)Políticas públicas: uma revisão da literatura (2006)NETWORK CENTRALITY, POWER, AND INNOVATION INVOLVEMENT: DETERMINANTS OF TECHNICAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE ROLES. (1993)Multidimensional Constructs in Organizational Behavior Research: An Integrative Analytical Framework (2001)Measuring transactive memory systems in the field: Scale development and validation. (2003)A Brief Tutorial on the Development of Measures for Use in Survey Questionnaires (1998)Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: a review of four recent studies (1999)A Partial Least Squares Latent Variable Modeling Approach for Measuring Interaction Effects: Results from a Monte Carlo Simulation Study and an Electronic-Mail Emotion/Adoption Study (2003)Fear of Reversal as an Explanation of Lower Court Compliance (2003)The Evolution of Common Law (2007)Reconsidering Judicial Preferences (2013)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1979Reliability and Validity Assessment5,882 cited
  • 1974Why the “Haves” Come Out Ahead: Speculations on the Limits of Legal Change2,807 cited
  • 2000Congress: A Political-Economic History of Roll Call Voting2,798 cited
  • 1937Politics : Who Gets What, When, How1,909 cited
  • 1978Factor Analysis1,416 cited
  • 2001Picking Federal Judges: A Note on Policy and Partisan Selection Agendas406 cited
  • 1998Judicial Partisanship and Obedience to Legal Doctrine: Whistleblowing on the Federal Courts of Appeals399 cited
  • 1994The Hierarchy of Justice: Testing a Principal-Agent Model of Supreme Court-Circuit Court Interactions365 cited
  • 1992Who Wins on Appeal? Upperdogs and Underdogs in the United States Courts of Appeals243 cited
  • 2002Making Law in the United States Courts of Appeals243 cited
  • 1995Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success223 cited
  • 1987Do The “Haves” Come Out Ahead? Winning and Losing in State Supreme Courts, 1870–1970220 cited
  • 2004Signals from the Tenth Justice: The Political Role of the Solicitor General in Supreme Court Decision Making210 cited
  • 2006The Influence of Oral Arguments on the U.S. Supreme Court202 cited
  • 1992

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Ideology, Status, and The Differential Success of Direct Parties Before the Supreme Court
199 cited
  • 1975Voting Behavior on the United States Courts of Appeals Revisited183 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.