SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Differential reporting of mixed DNA profiles and its impact on jurists’ evaluation of evidence. An international analysis
16 references·0 citing·40 second hop
Differential reporting of mixed DNA profiles and its impact on jurists’ evaluation of evidence. An international analysis (2016)Differential reporting of mixed DNA profi…Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach (2015)Perception problems of the ve…On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect (2014)On the interpretation of like…Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals (2010)Understanding of forensic exp…Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward (2009)Strengthening Forensic Scienc…Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward (2009)Strengthening forensic scienc…Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation (2009)Painting the target around th…Why Experts Make Errors (2006)Why Experts Make ErrorsHow the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence (2003)How the Probability of a Fals…Communicating statistical DNA evidence (2003)Communicating statistical DNA…Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice (2003)Adversarial versus Inquisitor…When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics? (2001)When are people persuaded by …Probabilistic reasoning in the law (1998)Probabilistic reasoning in th…A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework (1998)A hierarchy of propositions: …Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom (1995)Interpreting Evidence: Evalua…Avoiding the transposed conditional (1995)Avoiding the transposed condi…Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy. (1987)Interpretation of statistical…Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches (1981)Likelihood Ratio as Weight of Forensic Evidence: A Closer Look (2017)Juror comprehension of forensic expert testimony: A literature review and gap analysis (2019)Cognitive and human factors in legal layperson decision making: Sources of bias in juror decision making (2022)Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability (1973)Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases (1975)Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. (1983)Handbook of psychology in legal contexts (2003)Is Probabilistic Evidence a Source of Knowledge? (2014)Lay understanding of forensic statistics: Evaluation of random match probabilities, likelihood ratios, and verbal equivalents. (2015)Human Inference: Strategies and Shortcomings of Social Judgment. (1983)Science as Social Knowledge: Values and Objectivity in Scientific Inquiry (1992)Science studies: an advanced introduction (1998)What role should investigative facts play in the evaluation of scientific evidence? (2011)Implementing context information management in forensic casework: Minimizing contextual bias in firearms examination (2015)A hierarchy of expert performance. (2016)Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis (1984)The Daubert/Kumho Implications of Observer Effects in Forensic Science: Hidden Problems of Expectation and Suggestion (2002)Contextual information renders experts vulnerable to making erroneous identifications (2005)Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners. (2017)Cognitive bias research in forensic science: A systematic review (2019)Police-induced confessions, 2.0: Risk factors and recommendations. (2025)The Evidential Foundations of Probabilistic Reasoning. (1995)Statistics and the Evaluation of Evidence for Forensic Scientists (1996)A Perspective on Errors, Bias, and Interpretation in the Forensic Sciences and Direction for Continuing Advancement* (2009)Risk (2015)Comparison of Bayesian and regression approaches to the study of information processing in judgment (1971)On the psychology of prediction. (1973)New directions in attribution research (1976)Naked statistical evidence of liability: Is subjective probability enough? (1992)The ‘Heuristics and Biases’ Bias in Expert Elicitation (2007)More on the hierarchy of propositions: exploring the distinction between explanations and propositions (2000)The impact of the principles of evidence interpretation on the structure and content of statements (2000)Identification of gunshot residue: a critical review (2001)Accuracy and reliability of forensic latent fingerprint decisions (2011)Are Forensic Experts Biased by the Side That Retained Them? (2013)The forensic confirmation bias: Problems, perspectives, and proposed solutions. (2013)The Oxford Handbook of Language and Law (2012)A model for case assessment and interpretation (1998)Pronouns as a preliminary diagnostic for grouping Papuan languages (2005)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2009Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: A Path Forward1,298 cited
  • 2009Strengthening forensic science in the United States : a path forward957 cited
  • 1998A hierarchy of propositions: deciding which level to address in casework454 cited
  • 1987Interpretation of statistical evidence in criminal trials: The prosecutor's fallacy and the defense attorney's fallacy.407 cited
  • 1995Interpreting Evidence: Evaluating Forensic Science in the Courtroom368 cited
  • 2006Why Experts Make Errors292 cited
  • 2003How the Probability of a False Positive Affects the Value of DNA Evidence142 cited
  • 2001When are people persuaded by DNA match statistics?100 cited
  • 2014On the interpretation of likelihood ratios in forensic science evidence: Presentation formats and the weak evidence effect98 cited
  • 2009Painting the target around the matching profile: the Texas sharpshooter fallacy in forensic DNA interpretation96 cited
  • 1995Avoiding the transposed conditional87 cited
  • 2010Understanding of forensic expert reports by judges, defense lawyers and forensic professionals63 cited
  • 2003Adversarial versus Inquisitorial Justice57 cited
  • 2003Communicating statistical DNA evidence55 cited
  • 2015

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

Perception problems of the verbal scale: A reanalysis and application of a membership function approach
39 cited
  • 1998Probabilistic reasoning in the law34 cited
  • Cited by

    No citing works inside the corpus for this window.