Citation map · Study

SZodixStudyAcademic Library

Shelves Open access

Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated

Editor's Comments: Why Review? Because Reviewing is a Professional Responsibility

5 references·13 citing·43 second hop

FromToDepth

this work references cited by second hop

References

1985Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior26,744 cited
1988Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior15,312 cited
2007What Causes a Management Article to be Cited—Article, Author, or Journal?399 cited
2001Editorial peer review : its strengths and weaknesses231 cited
2002Editorial Peer Review: Its Strengths and Weaknesses81 cited

Cited by

2009Editor's Comments: Mentoring Colleagues in the Craft and Spirit of Peer Review42 cited
2008Successful Authors and Effective Reviewers34 cited
2011Effective Matrices, Decision Frames, and Cooperation in Volunteer Dilemmas: A Theoretical Perspective on Academic Peer Review33 cited
2021Editorial Work and the Peer Review Economy of STS Journals30 cited
2012The case for good reviewing26 cited
2021Publishing more than reviewing? Some ethical musings on the sustainability of the peer review process24 cited
2018On interference, collegiality and co-authorship: Peer review of journal articles in management and organization studies19 cited
2022Comparison of early career researchers and senior career researchers as peer reviewers: A questionnaire survey in China16 cited
2012Publications, Contributions, and the Social Dilemma of Scholarly Productivity: A Reaction to Aguinis, Debruin, Cunningham, Hall, Culpepper, and Gottfredson (2010)

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

13 cited

2013Growth and continuity at APJM13 cited

2022Towards peer review as a group engagement10 cited

2010Upon Further Review: A Survey of the Academy of Management Journal's Editorial Board10 cited

2025Reviewing is caring! Revaluing a critical, but invisibilized, underappreciated, and exploited academic practice9 cited