“She isn’t Someone I Associate with Pension”—a Vignette Study of Professional Reasoning

Marie Østergaard Møller

45 citations0/0 files storedProfessions and Professionalism

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Public Policy and Administration Research Social Work Education and Practice Management and Organizational Studies

Abstract

What drives frontline workers’ categorization of clients in rule-based settings with a large room for discretion? The literature on street-level bureaucracy offers a structural description of discretion that emphasizes working conditions, policy goals, personal preferences, client pressure and professional norms. However, in order to explain why frontline workers with the same room for discretion categorize clients differently, a theory of an epistemic understanding of discretion may contribute to this literature. Based on a vignette study of 24 interviews with Danish caseworkers, the analysis shows how professional reasoning, rules, and social stereotypes inform categorization and discretion. The findings indicate that caseworkers’ categorizations of clients are less responsive to clients’ needs and more sensitive to administrative reasoning when clients are associated with stereotypes of need. In addition, the analysis contributes to the theory of categorization and discretion in lower levels of government Keywords: Categorization, discretion, professionalism, stereotypes of need

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 45 citations exist upstream.

References

1988Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook 2006Constructing grounded theory : a practical guide through qualitative analysis 2010Development and Distortion of Malaysian Public- Private Partnerships: Patronage, Privatised Profits and Pitfalls DOI: 10.1111/j.1467- 8500.2009.00655.x 2014Constructing grounded theory 1986Qualitative Data Analysis: A Sourcebook of New Methods 1981Street-Level Bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the Individual in Public Services 2006Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis 1971Analyzing social settings : a guide to qualitative observation and analysis

Cited by

2018Measures of accountability and delegated discretion in activation work: lessons from the Norwegian Labour and Welfare Service 2025Public management and street-level bureaucrats 2019An approach to the development of comparative cross-national studies of street-level bureaucracy 2025Revisiting coping mechanisms on the street-level: a systematic literature review 2022Do visiting monks give better sermons? “Street‐level bureaucrats from higher‐up” in targeted poverty alleviation in China

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.