SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Self-Validation of Programmed Feedback Statements
5 references·4 citing·33 second hop
Self-Validation of Programmed Feedback Statements (1971)Self-Validation of Programmed Feedback St…The Current Status of Computer Interpretation of Psychological Tests (1969)The Current Status of Compute…Methodological problems in programmed composition of psychological test reports (1967)Methodological problems in pr…Computer interpretation of personality tests: The automated psychologist (1967)Computer interpretation of pe…Wanted—a good cook-book. (1956)Wanted—a good cook-book.Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Manual. (1951)Minnesota Multiphasic Persona…Confirming Personality Test Results in the Classroom (1983)Confirming Personality Test R…Variables affecting subjects' endorsements of psychological test results. (1982)Variables affecting subjects'…Comparison of Computerized versus Standardized Feedback and Accurate versus Inaccurate Feedback (1982)Comparison of Computerized ve…The effects of positive vs. negative wording on subjects' validity ratings of “true” and “false” feedback statements (1978)The effects of positive vs. n…A Multiphasic Personality Schedule (Minnesota) : I. Construction of the Schedule (1940)The Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (1966)Accuracy and generalizability of an automated MMPI interpretation system. (1974)MMPI profile types of exposers, rapists, and assaulters in a court services population. (1977)A computerized approach to cognitive behavioural assessment: An introduction to CBA-2.0 primary scales (1990)The fallacy of personal validation: a classroom demonstration of gullibility. (1949)The relationship between the judged desirability of a trait and the probability that the trait will be endorsed. (1953)Ethical principles of psychologists. (1981)Psychological Reports (2014)A method for the empirical study of psychodiagnosis. (1954)Antecedent probability and the efficiency of psychometric signs, patterns, or cutting scores. (1955)Construct validity in psychological tests. (1955)When shall we use our heads instead of the formula? (1957)Behavioral confirmation in social interaction: From social perception to social reality (1978)When self-presentation is constrained by the target's knowledge: Consistency and compensation. (1978)The acceptability of "fake" versus "bona fide" personality test interpretations. (1955)The ad hoc committee on social impact of psychological assessment. (1965)A further look at student acceptance of general personality interpretations. (1972)The Seventh Mental Measurements Yearbook (1973)Actuarial Description of Abnormal Personality: An Atlas for Use with the MMPI (1964)Development of a New Set of MMPI Scales (1965)Factor structure with the new set of MMPI scales and the formula correction (1966)Programmed Interpretation of MMPI and CPI (1966)A computer program for personality analysis (1968)Programmed Interpretation of the MMPI (1971)Digital-computer interpretation of inkblot test data (1964)Validity and reliability studies of a computer-based scoring system for inkblot responses. (1967)AUTOMATED PSYCHOLOGICAL TEST INTERPRETATION: the status in 1972 (1972)Comparing MMPI Statements and Mental Status Items (1972)Fully automated psychiatric diagnosis: Some new possibilities (1981)The Leyton Obsessional Inventory (1970)Loneliness within a nomological net: An evolutionary perspective (2006)Recommendations for a Standard Research Assessment of Insomnia (2006)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 1951Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory, Manual.582 cited
  • 1956Wanted—a good cook-book.338 cited
  • 1967Computer interpretation of personality tests: The automated psychologist31 cited
  • 1969The Current Status of Computer Interpretation of Psychological Tests17 cited
  • 1967Methodological problems in programmed composition of psychological test reports15 cited

Cited by

  • 1982Comparison of Computerized versus Standardized Feedback and Accurate versus Inaccurate Feedback4 cited
  • 1982Variables affecting subjects' endorsements of psychological test results.4 cited
  • 1978The effects of positive vs. negative wording on subjects' validity ratings of “true” and “false” feedback statements4 cited
  • 1983Confirming Personality Test Results in the Classroom2 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work