SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measurement and Presentation of Patient-important Outcomes, Using Pain Outcomes as an Exemplar, in Systematic Reviews: A Preconference Meeting at OMERACT 12
8 references·0 citing·33 second hop
Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measurement and Presentation of Patient-important Outcomes, Using Pain Outcomes as an Exemplar, in Systematic Reviews: A Preconference Meeting at OMERACT 12 (2015)Dialogue on Developing Consensus on Measu…Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop (2015)Optimal Strategies for Report…Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda (2015)Current State of Reporting Pa…Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective (2015)Consensus on the Need for a H…A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group (2015)A Call for Evidence-based Dec…Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported (2014)Survey of new 2007 and 2011 C…Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0 (2014)Developing Core Outcome Measu…Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses (2013)Updated Method Guidelines for…Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies (2000)Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to …The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study (2010)Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist (2011)Validating the Interpretations and Uses of Test Scores (2013)Core outcome domains for chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations (2003)Three Approaches to Qualitative Content Analysis (2005)Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life. A conceptual model of patient outcomes (1995)The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes (2010)Core outcome domains for clinical trials in non-specific low back pain (2015)A taxonomy has been developed for outcomes in medical research to help improve knowledge discovery (2017)Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey (2017)Statistical Methods for Meta-Analysis (1988)A general parametric approach to the meta‐analysis of randomized clinical trials (1991)Publication bias in meta-analysis its causes and consequences (2000)Causal Variables, Indicator Variables and Measurement Scales: An Example from Quality of Life (2002)Effects of psychotherapy for anxiety in children and adolescents: A meta-analytic review (2012)Psychological therapies for pathological and problem gambling (2012)Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider (2012)Core outcome sets and systematic reviews (2016)Prevention of selective outcome reporting: let us start from the beginning (2016)Systematic review of clinical outcome reporting in randomised controlled trials of burn care (2019)The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration (2009)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)Methods to Explain the Clinical Significance of Health Status Measures (2002)Interpretation of Changes in Health-related Quality of Life (2003)A brief overview of systematic reviews and meta-analyses (2016)Systematic reviews that include only published data may overestimate the effectiveness of analgesic medicines for low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2019)The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. (1998)Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses (2003)Assessment of Methodologic Quality of Randomized Trials of Interventional Techniques: Development of an Interventional Pain Management Specific Instrument (2014)The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for Assessing the Quality of Nonrandomised Studies in Meta-Analyses (2014)Effectiveness of behavioural change techniques in physiotherapy interventions to promote physical activity adherence in patients with hip and knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review protocol (2017)How effects on health equity are assessed in systematic reviews of interventions (2022)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2014Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0781 cited
  • 2000Bias in Meta-Analysis Due to Outcome Variable Selection Within Studies194 cited
  • 2015Optimal Strategies for Reporting Pain in Clinical Trials and Systematic Reviews: Recommendations from an OMERACT 12 Workshop157 cited
  • 2013Updated Method Guidelines for Cochrane Musculoskeletal Group Systematic Reviews and Metaanalyses151 cited
  • 2014Survey of new 2007 and 2011 Cochrane reviews found 37% of prespecified outcomes not reported44 cited
  • 2015Consensus on the Need for a Hierarchical List of Patient-reported Pain Outcomes for Metaanalyses of Knee Osteoarthritis Trials: An OMERACT Objective17 cited
  • 2015A Call for Evidence-based Decision Making When Selecting Outcome Measurement Instruments for Summary of Findings Tables in Systematic Reviews: Results from an OMERACT Working Group15 cited
  • 2015Current State of Reporting Pain Outcomes in Cochrane Reviews of Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain Conditions and Considerations for an OMERACT Research Agenda11 cited

Cited by

No citing works inside the corpus for this window.

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work