Trial complexity: A field investigation of its meaning and its effects.

Larry B. Heuer · Steven Penrod

86 citations0/0 files storedLaw and Human Behavior

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Jury Decision Making Processes Legal processes and jurisprudence Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems

Abstract

A field experiment is reported that examines the effects of trial complexity and trial procedures on jury performance. Juror question asking and notetaking were randomly assigned to 75 civil and 85 criminal trials. Principal components analyses of judges' responses revealed three components of trial complexity: evidence complexity, legal complexity, and quantity of information. None of these components was significantly related to judge-jury verdict agreement. Each component uniquely affected jurors' assessment of the trial, but none affected theirs or the judges' verdict satisfaction. Interactions reveal that juror questions were most beneficial for assisting the jurors with legal complexity and evidence complexity. Natural variation in judges' commenting on the weight and credibility of witnesses, or summarizing the evidence, use of special verdict forms, pattern instructions, and juror orientation was also measured. Of these, the use of special verdict forms appeared to provide the greatest benefits.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 86 citations exist upstream.

References

1967The American Jury.1979Making Legal Language Understandable: A Psycholinguistic Study of Jury Instructions 1986Judging the jury 1977Juridic decisions: In ignorance of the law or in light of it?1986Judging the Jury 1983Making jury instructions understandable 1982Improving the Ability of Jurors to Comprehend and Apply Criminal Jury Instructions

Cited by

2015The Impact of Audit Evidence Documentation on Jurors' Negligence Verdicts and Damage Awards 2009Jury decision‐making biases and methods to counter them 2008Jury Systems Around the World 2003Handbook of psychology in legal contexts 2008Strength of evidence, extraevidentiary influence, and the liberation hypothesis: Data from the field.1996Effects of trial complexity on decision making.2005REAL JURIES 2010Science in the jury box: Jurors’ comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.