Article2016

Employees and sustainability: the role of incentives

Kimberly K. Merriman · Sagnika Sen · Andrew J. Felo · Barrie E. Litzky

78 citations0/0 files storedJournal of Managerial Psychology

No readable copy stored yet — this record is metadata only.

No open-access location is known for this record yet.

Literature note Cite in a project Citation map

Environmental Sustainability in Business Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior Environmental Education and Sustainability

Abstract

Purpose – Organizational sustainability has become a priority on many corporate agendas. How to integrate sustainability efforts throughout the organization, however, remains a challenge. The purpose of this paper is to examine two factors that potentially enhance incentive effects on employee engagement in environmental objectives: explicit organizational values for sustainability and the performance objective’s complementarity with incented financial objectives. Design/methodology/approach – The authors employed a quasi-experimental design in which participants were randomly assigned to one of four conditions, including a status quo condition against which the treatments were contrasted. Participants (n=400) were comprised of a cross-section of US employees from a wide range of occupations and industries. Apost hocqualitative analysis provided additional insights. Findings – Incentive effects were enhanced (i.e. preference for the environmental objective was significantly higher) when the environmental project offered complementary benefits for financial objectives, but not when organization values emphasized sustainability. An entrenched status quo bias for financial performance was discerned among a subset of the sample. Research limitations/implications – Management scholars must pay close attention to the role of implicit norms for financial performance when investigating employee engagement in organizational sustainability efforts. From an applied perspective, framing sustainability objectives to emphasize financial benefits consistent with a financial mission may maximize employee engagement. Originality/value – This study contributes to understanding of organizational sustainability efforts at the individual employee level of analysis, a conspicuously small part of the organizational research surrounding this topic.

Paper brief

Loading…

Cite this work

Citation unavailable for this work.

BibTeX RIS CSL-JSON

No public copy is stored for this record, so only the metadata is cited.

Citations in this library

Citation map →

Stored only when both papers are in the corpus — 78 citations exist upstream.

References

1976Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure 1990Foundations of social theory 1989Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review 1997THE CORPORATE SOCIAL PERFORMANCE-FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE LINK 2011False-Positive Psychology 1991Multitask Principal–Agent Analyses: Incentive Contracts, Asset Ownership, and Job Design 1988Status quo bias in decision making 1991Anomalies: The Endowment Effect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias

Cited by

2019Silo-Busting: Overcoming the Greatest Threat to Organizational Performance 2021The COVID-19 pandemic and the role of responsible leadership in health care: thinking beyond employee well-being and organisational sustainability 2019Green entrepreneurial orientation and firm performance in South Africa 2020HR analytics: Employee attrition analysis using logistic regression 2020Stakeholder pressure, eco-control systems, and firms’ performance: empirical evidence from UK manufacturers

Explore the map →

Papers that cite the same references — the relational fallback while embeddings are still backfilling.

Imported from OpenAlex (CC0) — nothing here is generated.