SZodixStudyAcademic Library
ShelvesOpen access
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Archie Cochrane in his own words
0 references·14 citing·49 second hop
Archie Cochrane in his own words (1989)Archie Cochrane in his own wordsThe Statistical Fragility of Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials (2023)The Statistical Fragility of …Systematic reviews: Key concepts for health professionals (2022)Systematic reviews: Key conce…Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data (2019)Evaluating the impact of heal…Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review (2019)Do pharmacy intervention repo…The Struggle for Evidence in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine (2018)The Struggle for Evidence in …Kunnskapsoppsummeringer – ideologi og rutinisert praksis (2017)Kunnskapsoppsummeringer – ide…Defining Health in the Era of Value-based Care: Lessons from England of Relevance to Other Health Systems (2017)Defining Health in the Era of…How much do you need: a randomised experiment of whether readers can understand the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews without reading the full review (2014)How much do you need: a rando…The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration (2013)The evolution of assessing bi…Qualitative research within trials: developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit (2013)Qualitative research within t…Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research? (2013)Have Levels of Evidence Impro…Randomized Trials in Surgery: How Far Have We Come? (2012)Randomized Trials in Surgery:…The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on DanShen in the Treatment of Ischemic Vascular Disease (2009)The Quality of Randomized Con…Quality of clinical studies in neurosurgical journals: signs of improvement over three decades (2005)Quality of clinical studies i…LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IN ORTHOPAEDIC JOURNALS (2005)Publication Rates of Presentations at an Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (2009)Introducing levels of evidence to the journal (2011)An Analysis of References Used for the Orthopaedic In-Training Examination: What are Their Levels of Evidence and Journal Impact Factors? (2014)Levels of Evidence in the Clinical Sports Medicine Literature (2014)Open access publishing: a study of current practices in orthopaedic research (2014)More Informative Abstracts Revisited (1990)The effectiveness of m-learning in the form of podcast revision lectures in higher education (2007)iTunes University and the classroom: Can podcasts replace Professors? (2008)Why do we need Evidence-Based Methods in Cochrane? (2015)How to Put It Plainly? Findings From Two Randomized Controlled Studies on Writing Plain Language Summaries for Psychological Meta-Analyses (2021)How to communicate science to the public? Recommendations for effective written communication derived from a systematic review (2023)Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy (1990)Making sense of qualitative data (1996)Doing Qualitative Research (2010)Perspectives regarding Motivations for Adoption by Christian Adoptive Parents: A Qualitative Study (2017)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test (1997)The PRISMA Statement for Reporting Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Studies That Evaluate Health Care Interventions: Explanation and Elaboration (2009)The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2011)Assessing the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews of Health Care Interventions (2017)Nonpublication Rates and Characteristics of Registered Randomized Clinical Trials in Digital Health: Cross-Sectional Analysis (2018)Identifying the ‘incredible’! Part 1: assessing the risk of bias in outcomes included in systematic reviews (2019)Clinical Research in General Medical Journals (1979)The Contributions of Authors to Multiauthored Biomedical Research Papers (1994)Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Journals (1997)Quality of Clinical Studies in Aesthetic Surgery Journals: A 10-Year Review (2009)Level of evidence of clinical spinal research and its correlation with journal impact factor (2013)Editorial: Methodology and reporting of meta-analyses in the neurosurgical literature (2014)Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-based Competition on Results (2006)Redefining Health Care: Creating Value-Based Competition on Results (2007)Value-Based Health Care Delivery (2008)Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research (2010)Systematic review or meta-analysis? Their place in the evidence hierarchy (2013)New evidence pyramid (2016)Collaborating in response to COVID-19: editorial and methods initiatives across Cochrane (2020)Development of the Rehabilitation Health Policy, Systems, and Services Research Field: Quantitative Analyses of Publications over Time (1990–2017) and across Country Type (2020)The influence of bias in randomized controlled trials on rehabilitation intervention effect estimates: what we have learned from meta-epidemiological studies (2023)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: Guidelines for Reporting Observational Studies (2007)ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions (2016)Making any difference? Conceptualising the impact of safeguarding adults boards (2019)Debiasing the availability heuristic in student loan decision-making (2024)An Index of Factorial Simplicity (1974)Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions (2008)The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions (2011)An assessment of the reporting of tapering methods in antidepressant discontinuation trials using the TIDieR checklist (2023)RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials (2019)The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews (2021)Salario emocional en el compromiso laboral: Una revisión sistemática de la literatura científica en los últimos 5 años 2018 – 2022 (2025)
this work references cited by second hop

References

No references inside the corpus for this window.

Cited by

  • 2019Evaluating the impact of healthcare interventions using routine data165 cited
  • 2013Qualitative research within trials: developing a standard operating procedure for a clinical trials unit73 cited
  • 2013The evolution of assessing bias in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions: celebrating methodological contributions of the Cochrane Collaboration62 cited
  • 2013Have Levels of Evidence Improved the Quality of Orthopaedic Research?61 cited
  • 2017Defining Health in the Era of Value-based Care: Lessons from England of Relevance to Other Health Systems58 cited
  • 2005Quality of clinical studies in neurosurgical journals: signs of improvement over three decades48 cited
  • 2019Do pharmacy intervention reports adequately describe their interventions? A template for intervention description and replication analysis of reports included in a systematic review31 cited
  • 2018The Struggle for Evidence in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine30 cited
  • 2014How much do you need: a randomised experiment of whether readers can understand the key messages from summaries of Cochrane Reviews without reading the full review24 cited
  • 2022Systematic reviews: Key concepts for health professionals22 cited
  • 2012Randomized Trials in Surgery: How Far Have We Come?20 cited
  • 2023The Statistical Fragility of Orbital Fractures: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials18 cited

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

2009
The Quality of Randomized Controlled Trials on DanShen in the Treatment of Ischemic Vascular Disease
13 cited
  • 2017Kunnskapsoppsummeringer – ideologi og rutinisert praksis1 cited