SZodixStudyAcademic Library
DashboardShelvesOpen accessMy libraryInboxNotesWriteLearnAlerts
More
Ask your libraryNotificationsQuick citeReview
Study · an open academic library·Metadata from OpenAlex (CC0)·Shelves·OpenAlex metadata, de-duplicated
Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications
13 references·3 citing·49 second hop
Randomized trials are frequently fragmented in multiple secondary publications (2016)Randomized trials are frequently fragment…Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data (2014)Reanalyses of Randomized Clin…Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease (2013)Bias in Associations of Emerg…Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data (2010)Do Pressures to Publish Incre…“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences (2010)“Positive” Results Increase D…Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results (2007)Almost all articles on cancer…Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors (2005)Identifying outcome reporting…Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit? (2005)Can meta-analysis help target…Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2004)Outcome reporting bias in ran…Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials (2004)Empirical Evidence for Select…Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication (2004)Different Patterns of Duplica…Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg? (2001)Redundant surgical publicatio…Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study (1997)Impact of covert duplicate pu…A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial (1981)A method for assessing the qu…Biases in reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials, and potential impact on safety assessments in systematic reviews and therapy guidelines (2022)Biases in reporting of advers…Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles (2020)Analysis of articles directly…Outcomes in randomised controlled trials in prevention and management of carious lesions: a systematic review (2017)Outcomes in randomised contro…The cochrane database of systematic reviews (1996)Confirmation Bias: A Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (1998)Science and Engineering Indicators (2004)Why Science Is Not Necessarily Self-Correcting (2012)Reducing implicit racial preferences: I. A comparative investigation of 17 interventions. (2014)ChatGPT and the rise of large language models: the new AI-driven infodemic threat in public health (2023)The Publishing Game: Getting More for Less (1981)Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement (1999)Socially Assistive Robots in Elderly Care: A Mixed-Method Systematic Literature Review (2014)Academic Plagiarism Detection (2019)Allostatic Load and Mortality: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (2022)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1963)Why Most Published Research Findings Are False (2005)Recommendations for Increasing Replicability in Psychology (2013)Mind the Hype: A Critical Evaluation and Prescriptive Agenda for Research on Mindfulness and Meditation (2017)Meta-analysis in clinical trials (1986)Empirical Evidence of Bias (1995)Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical (1998)Funnel Plots in Meta-analysis (2004)CONSORT for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials in Journal and Conference Abstracts: Explanation and Elaboration (2008)Withholding Research Results in Academic Life Science (1997)Improving Validation Practices in “Omics” Research (2011)Evaluation of Evidence of Statistical Support and Corroboration of Subgroup Claims in Randomized Clinical Trials (2017)Fragility of Results in Ophthalmology Randomized Controlled Trials (2017)Misinformation in and about science (2021)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel group randomized trials (2001)The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials (2001)The Revised CONSORT Statement for Reporting Randomized Trials: Explanation and Elaboration (2001)Trial sequential analysis may establish when firm evidence is reached in cumulative meta-analysis (2007)Contour-enhanced meta-analysis funnel plots help distinguish publication bias from other causes of asymmetry (2008)CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials (2010)Meta-analyses involving cross-over trials: methodological issues (2002)Bias in Clinical Intervention Research (2006)Cognitive behavioural therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents (2015)Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) for Chronic Pain (2016)Publication bias in clinical research (1991)Reporting Recommendations for Tumor Marker Prognostic Studies (REMARK) (2005)Persistence of Contradicted Claims in the Literature (2007)Publication of Tumor Marker Research Results: The Necessity for Complete and Transparent Reporting (2012)Individual Participant Data Meta-Analysis for a Binary Outcome: One-Stage or Two-Stage? (2013)Statistical Methods for Examining Heterogeneity and Combining Results from Several Studies in Meta‐Analysis (2001)Meta‐Analysis Of Controlled Clinical Trials (2002)A systematic review identifies a lack of standardization in methods for handling missing variance data (2006)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association studies (STREGA) – an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)STrengthening the REporting of Genetic Association Studies (STREGA)—an extension of the STROBE statement (2009)Review papers : The statistical basis of meta-analysis (1993)Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: An annotated bibliography of scales and checklists (1995)A meta-analysis of the impact of short-term sleep deprivation on cognitive variables. (2010)
this work references cited by second hop

References

  • 2004Empirical Evidence for Selective Reporting of Outcomes in Randomized Trials1,845 cited
  • 1981A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial1,349 cited
  • 2010Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States Data804 cited
  • 2010“Positive” Results Increase Down the Hierarchy of the Sciences733 cited
  • 1997Impact of covert duplicate publication on meta-analysis: a case study699 cited
  • 2005Identifying outcome reporting bias in randomised trials on PubMed: review of publications and survey of authors612 cited
  • 2004Outcome reporting bias in randomized trials funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research442 cited
  • 2004Different Patterns of Duplicate Publication290 cited
  • 2007Almost all articles on cancer prognostic markers report statistically significant results231 cited
  • 2014Reanalyses of Randomized Clinical Trial Data185 cited
  • 2005Can meta-analysis help target interventions at individuals most likely to benefit?174 cited
  • 2001Redundant surgical publications: Tip of the iceberg?155 cited
  • 2013Bias in Associations of Emerging Biomarkers With Cardiovascular Disease108 cited

Cited by

  • 2017Outcomes in randomised controlled trials in prevention and management of carious lesions: a systematic review

Only edges whose both ends are imported exist here. Widen the year window, or show the whole map. Back to the work

22 cited
  • 2022Biases in reporting of adverse effects in clinical trials, and potential impact on safety assessments in systematic reviews and therapy guidelines21 cited
  • 2020Analysis of articles directly related to randomized trials finds poor protocol availability and inconsistent linking of articles14 cited